Texas Governor Greg Abbott has said he would “impose a 100 percent tariff” on New Yorkers moving to Texas.

“After the polls close tomorrow night, I will impose a 100% tariff on anyone moving to Texas from NYC,” the Republican wrote on X on Monday night.

Abbott’s post came on the eve of New York City’s mayoral election, in which Democrat Zohran Mamdani is the frontrunner. He is facing former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo—who is running as an independent after Mamdani emerged victorious in the Democratic primary in June—and Republican Curtis Sliwa.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 minutes ago

    Valentina Gomez, a Republican congressional candidate in Texas, wrote on X: “Greg, focus on lowering property taxes first. Hardworking people are losing their homes because of this.”

    Popular MAGA influencer Gunther Eagleman wrote on X: “Good! Now abolish property taxes for us that live here.”

    Ryan Fournier, a co-founder of the Students for Trump group, wrote on X: “Governor Abbott joked that he’d slap a 100% tariff on anyone moving from New York to Texas if Mamdani wins. Funny—but he’s not wrong. Stop fleeing liberal cities just to vote the same way you did there.”

    So here we have a spectrum of Republicans.

    1. I mean honestly that on its own, in isolation, is pretty reasonable, Texas has massive property taxes compared to almost every other state, she’s telling Abbot to stop wasting time messaging gibberish to idiots, she’s worried about her potential constituents.

    2. Ok, so uh, I guess we just don’t need a functioning, funded government in Texas. Eagleman is apparently pro-shutdown of the state of Texas… Aka, a libertarian? At least this is possibly a conceptually understandable idea, regardless of how stupid that idea is.

    3. … and now we get to the head-desk level of stupid. Ryan, are the people who voted for Mamdani going to be leaving NYC? … No? No it would be Republicans. Democrats who hate Palestinians …who apparently aren’t Republican or bigotted enough, or … Texas enough? I legitimately don’t think this person could handle making a flow chart with like, more than 2 nodes.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    All I heard was “And we will continue to do any and all absurd shit to distract from the fact that the President of the United States of America is a pedophile”.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    A guy cut me off in traffic today, so I tariffed the hell out him at the next light.

    That’s what this idiot sounds like.

  • brahn@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    dullard says stupid sir to distract from epstein resolutions, abbott supports kiddie fuckers

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Nobody knows what it means, but it’s provocative…

      Seriously, they know republican voters still don’t know what a tarif is.

      But they’re conditioned to support tarrifs and be against taxes, so Abbott can’t say he’s taxing them.

      And he definitely can’t say it’s a “wealth tax”…

      Like, dude went full circle and accidentally became a full on communist, probably without even realizing it.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Would republicans support taxing wealth if it’s the “right ethic group”

        Germany totally “taxed” wealthy Jews at some point.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          This is stupider…

          He’s threatening to tax wealthy New Yorkers who leave NYC after Mamdani is elected.

          He should be incentizing those moves to stoke fear the wealthy would flee NYC, or at least pretending to mean that so that common new yorkers might vote against their own best interests

          Like, theyve been trying to use “the wealthy will leave” right up to election day, then 180’d to “the wealthy can’t leave”.

          The wealthy are already voting for Cuomo

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            The wealthy are already voting for Cuomo

            I wouldn’t assume that, I bet there are a bunch of wealthy cat ladies on Staten Island voting for Sliwa…

      • altphoto@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Groceries! Ever since I learned that word my life has changed. Groceries, who would have thunked it!

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 hours ago

      For every human that is moved into the state of Texas from New York you must transfer ownership of another human to the state.

    • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It means that piss baby either doesn’t know tarrifs work, or that he’s just a lying shitbag that knows his retard supporters don’t know how tarrifs work

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Is “tariff” now the new “woke”? A term without any meaning that Republicans throw around just to give their brainless followers a starting point from which they can see their deluded fantasies as seemingly rooted in reality?

    So something along the lines of: “100 percent tariffs will teach you what happens when you are woke” or some other stupid crap like that.

    It’s hard to believe, but somehow US news are getting more absurd by the day, even though it should have reached rock bottom long ago…

    • Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      He’s probably trying to use it as some code for taxes that the chuds won’t freak out about. If it’s just a tariff, then it can be negotiated and exceptions can be made or something.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They’ve always been doing this to language ever since I can remember. See how they misuse terms like “freedom”, “liberty”, “patriotic”, “political correctness”, “activist”, and on and on…

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Texas is a massive rich petro-state with zero social safety net, I can’t think of a more stupid ideology about the best way to run things than the way people do in Texas.

      The power grid bullshit alone is murderous to vulnerable people.

      DO NOT move there!

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The conservatives are just complete assholes. That’s the ideology, full stop. A license to be a total asshole.