I dont want to live in this reality any more.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    22 hours ago

    If they are passing legislation for things they believe are a myth, then when is the anti-bigfoot legislation coming? What about Chupacabra leash laws? Vampire curfew? Ghost noise ordinances?

    My point is, I guess, that people typically don’t pass laws against things they think aren’t real in the first place.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I just wish I was allowed to live as an equal in peace as I feel fit to live.

    I hope each of those who voted this way never is able to use a public restroom again

  • Taldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    So many headlines over the past year are things I remember seeing out of China and Russia over the past decade

    Russian politicians claim the same thing about gays. I believe it was in Chechnya

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Seems cruel and unusual. Also does this mean a guy can’t clean the women’s bathroom and vice versa?

  • Taldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Reading through the bill, they use the term “biological sex” without defining it

    What amateurs are writing these laws? Not even defining terms? I get the vagueness of it is the point, but there are a lot of edge cases that will be in limbo from this

  • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    How far away are we from gay people just being stoned to death in public in the US?

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    Remember when you could get in a car with your mother/wife/sister/girlfriend/daughter/neice/grandma/aunt and drive across the country and they’d have the same human rights from sea to shining sea and now they gain and lose basic human rights as they cross state borders?

    Yeah, Republicans did that. They are traitors and the enemy of the American people.

  • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    IDK about y’all, but in that scenario, I’d just shoot the cop.

    Dead cops can’t arrest anyone, trans or not.

  • bobzilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Wait… if trans people are a myth, doesn’t that mean that anyone going into the women’s restroom is a woman and anyone going into the men’s restroom is a man?

  • TheFermentalist@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    2 days ago

    Serious question: if they are a myth, why the need to ban trans people from anything?

    I hereby ban dragons from Starbucks! And the bank! And from driving! Muahaha, I’m so fucking evil!!

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      Their logic, such as it is, is that since trans people don’t exist, anybody in the “wrong” bathroom is there for nefarious reasons.

      It’s false to anybody with a brain, because trans people do exist. In fact, even if you think gender dysphoria and trans identity are not how they’re commonly described, harsh punishments for using the “wrong” bathroom still don’t make sense, because the logical conclusion would be that those people are misguided or deluded, not predatory.

      Still, it behooves us all to understand the emotional reasoning behind gender-segregated bathrooms: in most cultures (at least Western ones, but I think it goes further) there is a deep-seated idea that certain things are wrong if done in the presence of people of the other gender. Cultures with very different attitudes to nudity, for example, still have gender-segregated baths and saunas. I don’t think there’s any logical reason for this, but people (especially conservatives) feel the need to preserve it: the idea of gender-neutral bathrooms is crazy to them.

      What, then, do you do with people who say their gender is other than what you, the dominant culture, say it is? Do you let them use the bathroom/shower/sauna they say they should? But then ANYONE could say their gender is different, and you wouldn’t have gender segregation at all! Oh no!

      And actually, I agree with this. I think if you’re going to let people pick which bathroom they use according to their self-identification, gender segregated bathrooms are pointless, so we should get rid of them. Of course, this is not a popular view even among moderate left-wingers in Western countries, never mind Republicans, so we have this stupid culture war.

      • Lemmyng@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Agree. The fuck is wrong with a bathroom that has le gasp a urinal AND a toilet in one?!

        Gender truly is a fuck.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          When my college moved to gender-neutral bathrooms they took every urinal out. It was a 60% loss in places to pee. Gender aside, it was a stupid decision.

    • dorumon@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thank you very much for banning me. Now I can go finally touch grass and not read the Internet and fascist going ons.

      • TheFermentalist@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Seriously dude (dudette? Non binary dragon??), don’t come back, because it’s a billion dollar fine and hundreds of years in horny jail

    • firelight@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is the wording in this really that trans people can’t use certain bathrooms, or that people must use the bathroom that aligns with their sex?

    • truthfultemporarily@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      They probably don’t care about trans people existing, just blaming the smallest minority group for distraction until it doesn’t exist anymore, then going to the next bigger one.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I could see the vigilante justice response to this would be the theft of gender labeled bathroom signs. It then becomes a 50/50 gamble whether any human that needs to empty their bladder goes to prison for 5 years. Even just opening the door to see if there are urinals or stalls-only should run afoul of this law. Bonus points for activists following lawmakers that voted for this when the lawmaker needs to use a bathroom in an unfamiliar place.

    • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      The vigilante move is to protect your trans homies by taking out the cop who is trying to arrest someone for being fuckin trans.