data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f129d/f129d2b22d73e1c04f80739727a3c603f21ca990" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2f93/f2f939022ffae29e4decb326a98f4493d0a2e13e" alt=""
“Confiscate” sure is a weird way to spell “steal”.
“Confiscate” sure is a weird way to spell “steal”.
Rule 1 clearly says “posts have the following requirements”.
You seem to be under the impression that this trial is going to be fair in any way. It’s a jury trial where the defendant is forbidden from talking to the press while the news media does its best to slander him to the public whenever the case is mentioned. Yes, in an ideal world you’d be right, but the people that need convincing of his guilt are going into the trial with their opinions half-formed against him and I guarantee you that the prosecution will veto any juror that seems like they understand proper standards for evidence.
So that the cops can beat black people and plant evidence, ovbiously.
That doesn’t matter, though. He isn’t being charged with manufacturing an illegal firearm so the prosecution does not have the burden of proving that he did so. Likewise, if he is being charged with gun trafficking, they still don’t need to prove where he got the illegal gun from, just that he had it.
And he’s being charged with terrorism, for fuck’s sake. Do you really think the standard for evidence at this trial will be a fair one? The prosecution is likely to get away with hearsay while the defense will be expected to provide DNA evidence from the actual killer as well as his parents and grandparents to get the case dismissed.
To be fair, there is probably at least one unloved person who isn’t a CEO.
“Voters” doesn’t mean “people who voted in the most recent election” but “people who are registered to vote” so the other commenter is correct.
Termux has been a thing for years.
If “voters” means the same in both cases, why did you use numbers that specifically only apply to the last election to make a point?