• Pirate2377@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I would love to use Firefox or IronFox on Android instead. However, it’s super insecure, so much so that even PG doesn’t recommend it. Not only that, they also run like shit, especially when used with a VPN. If it wasn’t for extension support, it would sadly just be inferior to chromium based browsers in every way, even for privacy. Firefox is the way to go on Linux, but on Android, wouldn’t recommend. Anyway, not that it’s going to matter much, if Google truly does start blocking use of GrapheneOS and lock down Android, then I’ll probably be switching to Droidian or Ubuntu Touch soon anyway

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          However, it’s super insecure, so much so that even PG doesn’t recommend it

          That’s some sad nonsense. Their “criteria” is some non-specific shit indistinguishable from slop generated from a butt.

          Tor Browser is the only way to truly browse the internet anonymously.

          Oh fuck the fuck right off with this, hackerman.

          Firefox runs better and performs better than any bloated chrome-with-crypto-ads would even wishes to run. And unless we count as “has inbuilt plugin for Tor” as a security feature, and we will be insane to do that, there is no reason to suspect it’s somehow worse than chrome-but-our-ceo-simps-for-trump.

          • Pirate2377@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            I don’t even use Brave’s Tor feature. Also, I don’t like Brave’s bloat but tbf, you can completely disable them all in the settings which is what I did. Btw, you don’t think that Google’s CEO simps for Trump? I hate the politics of Brave’s CEO, but not like big tech’s agenda is any better and Mozilla is subservient to Google whether they like it or not. Not to mention their constant pushing for adding AI features onto the vanilla browser.

            I might try Cromite, but I’m hesitant to use web browsers maintained by one or two people since browsers constantly have security exploits that need patched quickly, something that a couple people can’t maintain on their own. If anything, I would use Vanadium if I had GrapheneOS but I’m stuck to LineageOS right now, lol

            • Nalivai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 days ago

              I don’t even use Brave’s Tor feature.

              And yet you linked a page, that you apparently didn’t read, that says that you can only get privacy by using tor, and Brave© (not sponsored by the way) is beez knees because it has Tor inbuilt.

  • gurty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I love using Brave browser… swipes away crypto ad banner …because there is a massive focus… swipes away crypto ad banner …on privacy….

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I don’t understand. Why does Brave not exist? Is it because the developer is a chud? Fair enough. Is it because it’s Chrome? If so, does that apply to Vivaldi?

      • Chaunticleer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Can somebody explain something stupid to me? What exactly is wrong with Chromium? Does Google have backdoor access to anyone who’s running a Chromium based program or something?

        • dgdft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          They abuse the fuck out of their monopoly, basically.

          They made changes to limit the usefulness of adblockers (Manifest V3), they tried to force a remote attestation API (WEI API) a few years back that would let them do stuff like fully block users who aren’t running locked-down operating systems from using online banking software or accessing Youtube, they added many chrome-specific web APIs that are extremely helpful for fingerprinting and lock users into the chrome ecosystem, etc.

        • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          As a web dev I hate the trend of websites relying on chromium-specific quirks, there are a handful of sites I need to use which refuse to work in any non-chromium browser, and customer support will always tell you to just use chrome as if you’re not a normal person for using Firefox. So yeah what’s wrong with chromium to me is that it’s the new internet explorer when it comes to web standards. Websites and large businesses can afford to just not care if they are following web standards as long as it works in chrome, and if you have a problem it’s your fault for not using chrome.

          • KindaABigDyl@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            This is why I switched from LibreWolf. If I had to have a Chromium browser installed as a backup anyway for few important sites, I might as well use Chromium. Imo Chromium has won. It owns the web landscape. I’ve given up

            • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              Why don’t you at least use Ungoogled Chromium, Cromite, or Helium Browser? At least they prioritize security and privacy equally while not being tied to Ghoulgle.

                • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Is this because of the whole Manifest V3 thing that prevents uBlock Origin from being installed?

              • cybernihongo@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                Do you have an issue with desktop Cromite where the browser just straight up freezes except for maybe the menu button? I’d chalk up to being a Debian Linux weirdo, but my work-provided Windows 11 laptop also has this particular issue in the flesh. I switched back to Ungoogled Chromium because of it, and also cause I want uBlock Origin and no less.

                At least Cromite Android has extensions.

            • AldinTheMage@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              I use LibreWolf, and I do have issues with a few sites (my local utility company’s bill pay only works on chromium), but I still refuse to use a chromium based browser except for those specific sites.

              It is inconvenient, but it can still make a difference. If sites that have chromium only functionality see that enough FireFox users are trying to use the site, they may update it. I know web devs check those kinds of metrics.

          • almost1337@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Yeah, we’re back to the days of websites only supporting Internet Explorer because of proprietary features and weird quirks.

          • AldinTheMage@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Someone at work made a “who on earth uses FireFox” comment recently, like it was some obscure and inferior / outdated software (our company includes FF as part of the standard image for both PC and Mac users). I did not go into my “why chromium is evil” rant, but I did tell them how to adjust their settings to fix some performance issues they were having with it. I’m pretty sure they still switched to Chrome.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          What exactly is wrong with Chromium?

          It gives Google hegemony over web standards.

  • mesa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Heh coo.

    Any idea if SDF is coming back? Loved that lemmy instance and the community around it.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      They do a ton of sketchy shit. I was skeptical, but this article convinced me.

      If you need to use a Chromium browser, there are a shit-ton that aren’t Brave. I use Ungoogled Chromium.

    • prunerye@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Brendan Eich. Specifically his stance against same sex marriage. He was pressured to resign from Mozilla, which he cofounded, due to his support of California’s prop 8. Then he founded Brave. The Brave browser also has some annoying crypto and AI features turned on by default. I think it’s a perfectly fine piece of software. I use it as a second browser.

      • jdr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        It’s impossible to be good at programming and morality at the same time.

        That’s why I never tried with either.

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Aside from the homophobia, Brave also runs an ad network so I’m skeptical about their privacy claims.

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Their very shady history + their very bigoted owner + current shady tactics

      Edit: and on top of that it’s Chromium based

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Brave was found altering links to some crypto services like Binance to include their referral and basically profit from unknowing users, they also run an ad network, they rely on Chromium, thereby endorsing Google’s dominance over the modern Web, they are very crypto-positive, which is a problem for many in the open-source community, and on top of that, everything else others have said.

      • BigDiction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Vigilink is the vendor they use to do this iirc. Link hijacking for referral revenue is wild thing to base a business on, but I’ve seen more sketch things running around the ad tech industry.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Brave was found altering links to some crypto services like Binance to include their referral and basically profit from unknowing users, they also run an ad network, they rely on Chromium, thereby endorsing Google’s dominance over the modern Web, they are very crypto-positive, which is a problem for many in the open-source community, and on top of that, everything else others have said.

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The guy who made it has bad beliefs. It’s good software from what I can tell, and free as in speech and free as in beer, but if you use it you get his bad bigot cooties. You have to use free software by certified free range organic non-bigots or it rubs off on you I guess.

      • ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Okay that gave me a good chuckle. But really with FOSS software it’s important to be aware of biases the developers might have. Sure if it’s an open source project, in theory I can audit the code but realistically not so much. If the lead developer is a known bad actor, then there’s reason to be paranoid about vulnerabilities or backdoors being injected into the codebase.

        • deathbird@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Well there’s no code he can insert that will invalidate anyone’s marriage. And his philosophy on tech and privacy is good. I probably wouldn’t invite him to brunch, but I’m okay with his code.

  • Raccoonn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’ve used Firefox based browsers for as long as I can remember and I’d rather slam my dick in a car door than switch to garbage like brave. Every single one of those browsers is the same bloated Google-flavoured bullshit wearing a different fucking clown costume. Firefox is the only browser that doesn’t make me feel like I’m being rawdogged by corporate spyware every time I open a tab… Piss on carpet !!

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah, I don’t do web stuff, but I use the browser every day for all the microsoft stuff my employer uses and it’s 99% LibreWolf and then 1% switching to Firefox ESR that cane preinstalled on debian.

      If something didn’t work at that point, I’d probably fire up my Windows VM I use for testing before I’d install even chromium. I’ve installed it before but there’s just no need now.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Every single one of those browsers is the same bloated Google-flavoured bullshit wearing a different fucking clown costume

      Brave is even worse as they’ve been caught doing shady shit without permission on more than one occasion.