• WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I can’t believe there are actually people who are surprised about his ‘proposal’ at all. Like… everyone saw this coming, right? Plenty of people have been warning other people for years that Trump would do this sort of shit.

    But hey, what do I know. I’m just an alarmist fearmonger. Or whatever they used to call me.

    • wildlyfist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t mean to defend the Democrats, but the Pro-Palestine crowd has been throwing all the blame on the Democratic Party for the Gaza genocide. Which was wrong-headed as it was pretty obvious that the Trump admin would double down on US support to Israel… where the Democrats did do something to resolve the conflict.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        where the Democrats did do something to resolve the conflict.

        What are you referring to? Biden claimed to be “working toward” a ceasefire for 15 months then Trump’s ambassador went over there for 3 days and the ceasefire immediately happened.

        Trump is pro-genocide and has no problem wiping out all Palestinian life but him and Biden are equally as bad on this issue

        • wildlyfist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think Democrats did what they could, but due to Trump and Elon being buddies of both Bibi and Iran (and Russia), sectarian gimmicks have supplanted conventional diplomacy. It’s now a matter of who’s with what team.

          But that doesn’t take away that Trump is okay with ethnic-cleansing the whole area from Palestinian Arabs, to take ownership of Gaza and redevelop it for Israel. That’s probably what Jared was planning for years.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The “two parties are the same,” “Genocide Joe” people are literally quibbling about that just to maintain their arguments and it’s depressing.

  • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I guess all the “Genocide Joe” commenters aren’t getting paid to skew the election anymore, so they won’t be here to comment.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I only started using the term after the election, I wish I was paid. It’s crazy how I’m expected to shut up about it for the next 4 years. Apparently, asking the dems to change their stance on genocide of everything is too much and everyone would rather stick their head in the sand. The moment someone enables it just a bit more then them, they get none of the blame and we get to wait through 4 years of shit just for them to give us literally the same stance.

      Both parties enable it and are complicit. Defending either on the subject is clear bootlicking imo.

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        No one is defending either on the subject. We are simply stating that one is WORSE than the other by an order of magnitude. Honestly, how can you not see that?

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          His comment implies anyone speaking disfavorably about the dems stance on genocide is somehow a paid shill.

          Read the rest of the comments. It’s always the same thing. The dems lost because the voters got manipulated into thinking genocide was something to draw a line over. Well it fucking was. I still think not voting and voting for Trump of all people is massively stupid but I hate the message we are sending.

          Trump isn’t worse, he’s the same on it. We shouldn’t be calling them anything other then Genocide Joe and Genocide Trump. Biden did a lot of good but his whole legacy is not breaking with genocide.

          We have 4 years to exert pressure and make sure the next candidate isn’t a mossad and wallstreet plant. Instead we are infighting like peasants and trying are hardest to not hold the politicians who are suppose to represent us accountable.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            His comment implies anyone speaking disfavorably about the dems stance on genocide is somehow a paid shill.

            We’re easy to dismiss that way. Then they don’t have to think about how monstrous they have been to support genocide all this time.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                She was the only viable option other than trump, as pro-genocide centrists were so fond of gloating. I voted for her. You gonna gloat that I voted for your genocide now?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This too shall pass and once it has, we shall remember the names of those that pushed genocides, those that pushed anti science that will inevitably cause the next pandemic.

    • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean this is a pretty weak ass take and it’s not even really right. Like after this “passes” we will be fully locked in to rocketing off the edge of the climate abyss and there is nothing anyone could possibly do to prevent it. They will try with Geo engineering but that’s a toss up at best.

      No one will remember anyone.

      • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Climate change has a relatively cheap and easy solution.

        Aresol sprays can buy a few decades of time if things get too hot.

        We already have cheap solar and cheap batteries are becoming a reality. We only need a cheap, non-intermittent energy source to provide baseload energy. Cheap nuclear power is possible and can fill that niche - we had the tech in the past and China has it today.

        For about $1T a fleet of reactors could be built to extract all the excess carbon from the atmosphere in 50 years, working in tandem with cheap solar energy and cheap batteries to power human civilization.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Its not cheap and not a solution.

          It will give us a temporary reprieve at best. We still need to solve the issue by lowering the CO2 in the environment. Chemically speaking, you’ll basically have to spend the same amount of energy to pull all the CO2 out as we got over the past 200 year by putting that CO2 in the atmosphere.

          That is if we have 100% efficient machines, however. In reality most combustion engines get 30% at best. Electrical system to pull it out will do some 70%? Let’s call it 50 on both, so you’ll have to double the amount of energy that this cost twice.

          Basically, to get CO2 back to preindustrial levels we’ll have to spend 4x the amount of ALL the energy we’ve spent over the past 200 years.

          You say it’s cheap? Basically double all energy prices (and with that, the prices of everything and destroy all economies) for, say, the next 50 years or so and generate twice the amount of electricity we do now, and we’ll be fine.

          • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Why comment if you don’t understand physics. I’m not saying turn the carbon into hydrocarbons, which is wat you are implying.

            Carbon sequestration takes way less energy than the energy released during burning.

            • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Why comment when you’re just randomly going to claim that ther person you disagree with must not know the subject because they disagree with you?

              Sure, don’t convert back to hydro carbons. Where are you going to store all that CO2 in a way that you know it guaranteed won’t escape?

              Do you have any idea how much CO2 you’re talking about? Are you going to store it in high pressure tanks? Are you going to freeze it maybe and put it in caves? Pump the gas underground and pray it won’t sleep out?

              The reason that I’m talking about converting it back to hydrocarbons is exactly that: you need to store it somewhere stable and reliable. For the incredible amounts that we have to store, there aren’t that many options beyond making hydro carbons and storing those

              • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Perhaps read an introductory article on carbon storage, or ask ChatGPT:

                Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): This involves capturing CO₂ emissions from industrial sources, transporting it, and storing it underground in geological formations.

                Direct Air Capture (DAC): This technology captures CO₂ directly from the air and stores it underground or uses it in industrial processes

                It’s a sad state of affairs that a fellow human being is more insufferable to talk to than an AI.

                • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yeah, you’re right, you are insufferable and sad.

                  Having said that:

                  The amount of CO2 to store, depending on how far you want to go with removing all the CO2 humans have put in the atmosphere goes in the order of cubic kilometers. Humans have been, and continue to be busy beavers. Good luck with storing that in tanks.

                  Storing it in geological formations may be possible in a limited fashion but since it would be in gas form there is a litany of problems with that if you want to be absolutely sure it won’t escape.

                  Instead of bitching and moaning it may be more productive to just, you know, stay on subject.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh I know, but one word has a much bigger social impact than the other.

        Its the same difference between molested and raped. You typically see in news headers that an adult male raped a little girl, but an adult women molested a little boy. One sounds much worse than the other, yet both are the same thing

        • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Granted but they’re not the same thing. Ethnic cleansing is more broad then genocide, and genocide TECHNICALLY doesn’t have to be ethnic cleansing (but as far as I know always has been).

          IMO ethnic cleansing in general can be more insidious. If you drive people from their homes and replace them with your own settlers, that’s ethnic cleansing. But it’s complex enough that the right wing will deny that it is such.

          See: Palestine and the West Bank.

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            And while we’re discussing the correct word, he already said and did worse, again.

            Theae are going to be 4 long long years

    • xenomor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Fuck off with this nonsense. Kamala would literally push the same policies, just like Joe did. The only difference would be that she’d use vague and hollow language to keep a pretense of humanity up so people could continue pretending that they themselves are not contributing to this atrocity. Your naive picture of mainstream Democrats is why that party continues to be as ineffective as it’s been for 50 years. I welcome all the neoliberal Lemmy downvotes. Assholes.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Interesting how you’re more interested in condemning Biden and Harris for this thing they didn’t do than Trump for doing it. In fact, you seem very unbothered by the actual plan here because the Democrats weren’t involved.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I can’t even blame Russia at this point. These people seriously do not give a shit about this genocide apart from the political points it can score them.

        • xenomor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I will think back to threads like this every time I wonder why Democrats never achieve anything meaningful and the country continues to lurch toward fascism. You all seem to be more interested in team sports than actually having principles and expectations for your own party.

          • _stranger_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            The “leftists” on here literally supported Trump. Their reason doesn’t matter, they’re fascism-enabling Trump supporters in every way that matters.

            If you didn’t vote, or if you didn’t vote for Kamala, you helped Trump get elected. That’s not politics, it’s math.