• ranzispa@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Systemd has a field which could be used to store age, which a system which has age verification could use to store the age.

    Just like the system which performs age verification could store that information in a file.

    I guess ext4 is age verification as it allows storing age of birth.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Didn’t they shitcan the age verification thing in systemd and they fire the guy who put it in? Or was that just a joke post?

  • durinn@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Raise your hand if you have supplied your mail address to your installation of git[1].

    I hope people will be this persistent in protesting when apps start requiring actual verification.


    1. Couldn’t think of a better example right now, but seriously: JUST DON’T SUPPLY YOUR AGE. ↩︎

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    And it can be used to verify how old you are.

    How?

    This is the part I’m hung up on. What actually physically happens to make me enter my real birthday in the systemd user field, and verify it’s actually my birthday?

    January 1 1900 has been my official online birthday forever.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    It is not age verification

    It could be used as part of a age verification system but it isn’t by itself age verification. You are doing the equivalent of calling a set of tires a car.

      • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        My dog could make an account if he could just enter a birthday.

        It’s the verification part of age verification that is the issue.

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    question: do california, colorado, or brazil’s laws have any teeth?

    what is the penalty if i lie? (a) and am an adult? (b) and am a minor? [i don’t really care but for completeness sake]

    also, you know those websites that ask for your age so you can see the vidya trailers? will this bypass that so i can just see the redband or am i going to have to put in 1/1/1970 TWICE GODSDAMMIT

    • Zanz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      The ca law specifically requires parental configuration of new devices and they do not restrict content. It is there to prevent algorithmic feeds and data collection of minors. It is not age verification and does not allow for content restrictions.

      Other places want to use the os to restrict content. There are lobbyists trying to get it to tie an ID to your os and to restrict/report content.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I better question in terms of the teeth of the laws is, are there any real consequences to an operating system provider just ignoring them and not providing any kind of age verification in their software whatsoever?

      The question I assume will get answered soon enough by GrapheneOS since they have told everyone asking for OS age verification to go pound sand.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    It can’t actually be used to verify anything. As implemented, it just reports whatever you entered. It’s just as valid as those birthday fields on websites that cater to users that share a 1st of January birthday.