Israel’s war in Gaza is chipping away at so much of what we – in the United States but also internationally – had agreed upon as acceptable, from the rules governing our freedom of speech to the very laws of armed conflict. It seems no exaggeration to say that the foundation of the international order of the last 77 years is threatened by this change in the obligations governing our legal and political responsibilities to each other.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    If we consider UN as being the main arbitrator on who gets to launch a war, then to mention a few instances…

    1950: North Korea illegally attacks South Korea.

    1956: Soviet Union illegally invades Hungary.

    1956: Israel / France / UK illegally invade Egypt. All invaders withdraw after UN condemnation and international pressure.

    1964: USA illegally escalates Vietnam War.

    1967: Israel launches the Six-Day War, illegality debated.

    1968: Soviet Union illegally invades Czechoslovakia.

    1973: Egypt and Syria attack Israel.

    1974: Turkey illegally invades Cyprus.

    1978: Vietnam illegally invades Cambodia.

    1979: Soviet Union illegally invades Afghanistan.

    1982: Israel illegally invades Libanon.

    1983: USA illegally invades Grenada.

    1989: USA illegally invades Panama.

    1990: Iraq illegally invades Kuwait. Got their ass kicked though so that worked out fine.

    1999: NATO illegally bombs Yugoslavia.

    2003: US and UK illegally invade Iraq.

    2008: Russia illegally invades Georgia.

    2014: Russia illegally invades and annexes Crimea.

    2015: Saudi-Arabia illegally invades Yemen.

    2022: Russia illegally invades Ukraine.

    I probably forgot a few. No ill meaning meant, just missing knowledge.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      58 minutes ago

      You really have to do whataboutism on every post concerning Israel.

      1967: Israel launches the Six-Day War, illegality debated.

      Nice how you question the illegality of Israel doing war crimes.

  • known_unknown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    179
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    The Jewish people of the world deserve apology from the government of isreal for using their suffering as a political tool in service of genocide.

    In conflating politics and imperialism with lineage and race, the political movement of Zionism sows incalculable hatred into the world in the name of Judaism, so that they can reap it later, when Jewish people suffer as meat shields, as justification for expansionism, and forever-war. Down with this theocratic shell game.

    • oakey66@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      As someone who is a Jewish refugee in the US, there are more than enough Jewish folks in Israel and around the US who are completely fine with what the government of Israel is doing. They should not be let off the hook. I say this fully realizing that the pro Palestinian sentiment has a large Jewish constituency in the US. So it’s not to paint with a broad brush. But people living in Israel are almost 3/4 in support of what is happening and the only protests in that country were from people who wanted to rescue the hostages but were fully on board with the horrors the country is committing in the name of Jews around the world. The conflation of a religion with an ethnicity will end up making us less safe.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That’s not because they’re Jewish, though, it’s because they’ve let their ego and pride overcome their empathy for their fellow human beings.

        There’s plenty of non-Jewish people who are also perfectly happy to profit off the suffering of Palestinians.

      • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Those were absolutely not the only protests in Israel, those were the only protests in Israel that got coverage and support from the government. The protests against what was happening were violently suppressed and silenced as has been happening for quite some time. Yes the large anti netanyahu protests made little mention of Palestinians rather than ceasefire deals to bring the hostages home but that is how you bring people together politically.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      My pro-palestinian praxis is making sure my Jewish neighbours have no reason to even think about aliyah. Jewish safety? It’s here. Reverse doikayt.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The Palestinian people deserve a lot of apologies from a lot of assholes on the internet that have monetized their suffering.

      And a lot of people in the Arab world deserve an apology from the Ayatollah of Iran for using them as meat shields in their failed attempt to wipe Israel off the map.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Is it? I don’t even hear anything out of the Arab states. It should but I don’t see much.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      This war is of course a huge tragedy, but as someone who sees gaza war as a local conflict borderline affecting few cities, I can’t help but chuckle how much lemmy ignores the largest country in the world waging war in Europe and only escalating by every month, while western countries can’t seem to keep up in production. It’s Russia who will break the world, not some conflict in middle east.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Lol, calling Russia the largest country in the world is a strange way to increase the might of a faded superpower who can’t deploy an army to win against a country much smaller than them.

        It is absolutely a big deal and most of Europe offers financial, military and humanitarian assistance above what you’ll see on Lemmy. The difference is the genocide in Palestine is war crime after war crime. Sure, Russia commits and has committed war crimes, but even they follow most of the rules of war. Israel is genocidal. It’s supported by their people. It’s abhorrent.

        I think Israel is foolish. They are protected by their international support and not viable on their own. Trump is unpredictable and nationalistic. They could get left out in the cold, like USA did to Ukraine very easily. Netanyahu has is ear. As does Putin and the Saudis. In trumps case, it’ll be what he can get. Israel have less to offer while requiring the funding the others don’t.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I think Israel is foolish. They are protected by their international support and not viable on their own. Trump is unpredictable and nationalistic.

          That’s weird logic. If we’re going with Trump being unpredictable, then it really doesn’t matter what Israel does in terms of maintaining support from Trump.

          And countries don’t base foreign policy based on what teenagers on the internet want. They base it on interests. What has Israel done that goes against anyone’s national interests? Iran is a thorn in everyone’s side, and Hezbollah has been weakened and cut off from easy supply from Iran because Assad’s regime is gone. It’s not in anyone’s interest for Iran to have nuclear weapons, and Israel has proven their capability in taking out Iran’s air defenses. The Houthis are a problem for global trade and Trump isn’t going to hit them as long as they keep to their deal and not hit US shipping.

          So given everyone’s interests most countries might wag their finger at Israel publicly for political reasons, but people in power know that if their people were taken hostage by terrorists, they’d do much the same thing as Israel has done. The US has become unreliable in dealing with the middle east (not really caring about Houthis attacking other country’s shipping) so they need an ally in the region to keep Iran and their proxies in check. And Israel has demonstrated a lot of capability in that regard. So do you think countries are going to isolate Israel for the sake of a small group of protesters constantly shouting insane slogans?

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I mean that Israel depends on usa support. That could disappear on a whim.

            War crimes and normalised genocide is a risk to all countries sovereignty.

            You’re looking at the current layout of the middle east. It’s a constantly changing unstable environment. Iran going nuclear is in nobodies interest but Iran.

            Not punishing Russia for invasion of Ukraine showed the world that if you don’t want to be subject to larger countries rule, you need nukes. Ukraine is the only country to voluntarily give them up. Look how that turned out. Israel has not signed the non proliferation treaty. All other signatory countries have an obligation to stop them too. Where was that will?

            Israel won’t be isolated due to protests. Israel receives support as a vassal state to be useful in the middle east. USA is no longer dependent on the middle east. Europe less so, but still dependent. Israel is therefore less useful. So support will end eventually, irrespective of Israel’s actions. Israel might hasten that end with actions that are politically damaging for the politicians in countries that enable their genocide.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The only way Russia can win is if Trump bails them out. Which is a possibility, but that would just be Trump breaking things.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure it’s just Trump breaking the world order and eroding the freedom of Americans.

    When the Israel-Hamas war is over do you really think everything is going to go back to normal in the US and the rest of the world?

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Read the article. The most egregious violations occurred during the Biden administration. Biden is better at Trump as a whole, but on the Gaza issue, both have support for Israel locked in at 100%. People often fall for the marketing - Biden virtue signals while Trump vice signals. Biden made a few token show gestures towards Palestinian rights, and Trump gleefully celebrates his cruelty. But in terms of actual tangible support for Israel? Trump’s record is a direct continuation of Biden’s. The Biden admin for example were the first ones to propose the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. That isn’t something Trump came up with - he just vice signaled with his stupid ‘Gaza riviera’ plan, while Biden’s plan for ethnic cleansing was discussed quietly.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Myopic US take. The Israel lobby is all through the western world and has pushed almost every government into the corner of accepting this racist genocidal war lest they be labelled anti-Semitic.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The complicity of many national governments in this genocide, including my own (Canada), will be remembered with disdain.

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Zionism is a destructive toxic ideology of fascistic bloodlust and racial supremacy. It is the true descendent of Nazi ideology.

    • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Given that the Zionist movement was founded decades before the Nazi movement, I would say Nazis are the descendants.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        More accurately, they’re both separate descendants of ethnonationalism which was a popular ideology at that time. And still today, evidently, though it seemed to be in decline for a bit during the post-war period.

      • madlian@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Nazis had nothing to do with the Jewish people establishing a homeland in Palestine. Joining those two groups is ridiculous and rude to Jewish people.

        The Jewish people began by buying the land legally in the late 1800s as a way to escape persecution. That pissed off the local Arabs (understandably) and both of them started arguing—which was not usually violent until 1920-30ish.

        That said, after it became a British Mandate (1917), Israel got a ton of international support. And obviously after WWII, they got whatever they wanted…. Which, was choosing violence.

        A lot of the reason the Arabs got little support was because they were fragmented, with no leadership. Each of their revolts were seen as a threat and not a legitimate push back against colonization. And, after the Ottoman Empire fell, England and France “stole” that land, so revolts were more or less terrorism (in their eyes, of course).

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The Jewish people began by buying the land legally in the late 1800s as a way to escape persecution.

          This is completely ignoring the boycott and parallel society angle. What Zionists did in pre-mandate Palestine was also forced expulsion of Palestinians; the forcing part was simply delegated to the state. Had they simply wanted to settle in Palestine nobody would’ve minded, but that was fundamentally not what the Zionist project was.

          According to Israeli historian Benny Morris, Zionism was inherently expansionist and always had the goal of turning the entirety of Palestine into a Jewish state. In addition, Morris describes the Zionists as intent on politically and physically dispossessing the Arabs.

          The World Zionist Organization established the Jewish National Fund (JNF) in 1901, with the stated goal “to redeem the land of Palestine as the inalienable possession of the Jewish people.” The notion of land “redemption” entailed that the land could not be sold and could not be leased to a non-Jew nor should the land be worked by Arabs.[145] The land purchased was primarily from absentee landlords, and upon purchase of the land, the tenant farmers who traditionally had rights of usufruct were often expelled.

          -Wikipedia

          Nazis had nothing to do with the Jewish people establishing a homeland in Palestine.

          Nazism had a lot to do with the German people expanding their homeland to Eastern Europe and Russia and murdering the inhabitants. Starting to see the similarities now? Nazism and Zionism are sister ideologies, both fruits from the same rotten tree that is European settler colonialism.

          • madlian@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Anyone could argue that “my people deserve this” is a similar ideology. That’s just false equivalence. You are cherry picking, and ignoring a whole lot of history and intention.

            Has Israel moved towards a similar ideology? Yes. But to claim in started out with that intent is just angry jaw flapping.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Anyone could argue that “my people deserve this” is a similar ideology.

              “My people deserve this land at the expense of its current inhabitants” is fascism, or at least the underpinning thereof, so you’re not wrong there. Nazism, Zionism, Manifest Destiny, it is literally the same thing manifesting in different ways. Look up “blood and soil” and “Lebensraum”. Ben Gurion is literally on record saying “we must remove the Arabs and take their place”. The Nakba started before the founding of Israel. If you have an argument for how the Nakba was anything but fascism, let’s hear it, but so far you’re not saying anything of substance.

              But to claim in started out with that intent is just angry jaw flapping.

              Okay let’s try this. Try this online quiz and see if you can get more than 15/21.

              • madlian@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                10 hours ago

                It’s really easy to cherry pick similar statements from people and compare them and make a whole website. Anyone could do the exact opposite.

                If you’re going to quote people, you need to use dates because as I have said before dates matter.

                • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Ben Gurion’s is 1937.

                  It’s really easy to cherry pick similar statements from people and compare them and make a whole website.

                  My dude non-fascists don’t say “when we settle [region], [group] will have no choice but to scurry like drugged cockroaches” (dated 1983 btw). Also the site has dates and sources for the quotes; most Zionist quotes are recent but a few are from the 20th century with two from before WWI. They even have one by Herzl himself. Zionism was and continues to use and be predicated on downright Nazi antisemitic propaganda about how Jews can never live with non-Jews and how diaspora Jews are sickly and weak and all that shit. That’s why they shit on Holocaust victims, for instance.

        • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Nazis had nothing to do with the Jewish people establishing a homeland in Palestine

          They actually had a huge amount to do with the creation of Isreal, actively encouraging and facilitating the movement of German Jews there.

          • madlian@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            12 hours ago

            The result of the persecution against the Jews resulted in an influx of them going down there. However, the persecution was long before World War II and the Nazis did not directly assist that migration and therefore comparing the two groups as a team or descendants is offensive.

            Facts:

            • Zionism happened before Nazism.
            • The migration of Jewish people to Palestine began long before WWII.
            • The only thing the Nazis did was speed up that migration and establish international sympathy for the Jewish people.

            Now, if you’re saying Israel today is Nazi-like… then yeah I agree completely.

        • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Zionists are similar tool of oppressiom to nazis

          The Jewish people began by buying the land legally in the late 1800s as a way to escape persecution. That pissed off the local Arabs (understandably) and both of them started arguing—which was not usually violent until 1920-30ish

          Arab was pissed of when the zionists plan became clear. Owning lands do not give you right to declare a state

          There was a group of Yemeni jews who settled in palestine and people was fine with them. Arabs and those jews was going to each other festivities.

          • madlian@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 hours ago

            The state declaration was in 1948. Zionism was established in 1897.

            That leaves 51 years for things to go wrong—and they did.

            If things got pretty bad around 1920, that’s just a few years after Britain put its dirty cock in the mix. And I think we can both agree British colonialism has been the cause of a ton of problems.

            Zionism was a solution to Jewish statelessness and persecution. In its early conception, Zionism was not a tool of oppression, but rather a form of self-determination.

            Did Zionism become a genocidal maniac? Yes.

            • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              Zionism was a solution to Jewish statelessness and persecution. In its early conception, Zionism was not a tool of oppression, but rather a form of self-determination.

              Zionists had no right to impose a state in any country. Even if the state was in Argentine or Japan or the USA, the population would have not accepted either. Facing a persecution is not a valid argument against imposing a state on the land of people who had nothing to do with the oppression .

              No matter how peaceful the ideology started , fact is fact Zionism became violent and is the source of the whole conflicts with the help of the British empire.

              • madlian@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I agree with you. Zionism did not start out similar to Nazism, and overtime, with the help of the British government, it became something significantly terrible and has lost all focus of the original intention: to escape persecution.

                And… over years there have been more and more Pointless deaths – mostly caused by Israel. And in 2025, I don’t think anyone could argue against it being full on genocide against non-Jewish people in Palestine.

                • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  lost all focus of the original intention: to escape persecution.

                  They could have escaped percussion and live as normal citizens of Palestine but no the plan of Herzl was always to impose a state and displace the local population

                  Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895

                  The property owners will come over to our side. According to my conception, the majority of the local population will have to be transferred elsewhere.

                  We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our own country. - Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895

                  Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly - Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895

                  Nazi was quickly in position of power so they was able to execute their plan very fast at first Nazism exclusion, discrimination, and the removal of Jews from German society then the final solution and the holocaust . Zionism needed more time to do it. Now in 2025 we are in the final stage of Zionism , the complete eradication of Palestinians in Gaza and slowly continuing eating the west bank

                  The Nazis were doing mass shooting, the IDF did mass shooting and mass bombing. Both the Nazis and the idf are starving people. The Nazis used gas chambers, the idf is shooting at people seeking aids with the new terrorist organization claiming to be an aid organization.

                  I am not saying both are equally the same and that the genocide in Gaza is worse than the holocaust but i think it is still fair to compare both rhetoric and methods

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    The split is between governments and the general public. I don’t know too many individuals who are ok with what is going on. And if they are, they are being awfully quiet about it.

    • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You should go and read some daily mail comments on articles about the war (genocide). They’re a bunch of frothing murderous horrors.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          As someone who has to deal with real people at demonstrations regularly, these horrible genocidal sentiments are not just limited to internet trolls unfortunately.

          Also as much as they are detached from the general population, all the politicians and Israel lobbyists and MIC lobbyists still are real people too.

    • madlian@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The people who are okay with it are the ones who hate the Muslims. Which is a shockingly large number of people and governments.

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    In repression of counter speech against genocide in almost all western countries to some degree their hand has been shown once again to be prioritizing order over law’s rotting corpse.