• ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I think a swarm of antelopes sounds incredibly terrifying:

      Just a mass hooves, fur, and antlers; can’t tell where one ends and the next begins; roaming across the land, leaving only destruction in its wake…

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      can 1 million be considered a herd? a swarm of locusts can turn intoa plague. it can also refer to plague of field mice, or rabbits.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Okay, “swarming herds of antelopes” would satisfy me. Or “plague of a million antelopes.”

        Maybe it’s just me, I feel like swarming is something you do with lots of legs and maybe some wings. And the ickiness of small bodies moving in waves, chittering and buzzing.

        Thundering hooves and sharp horns feels like a wholly different terror.

    • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      “swarm” here is a verb, not a noun. As in, “to swarm”.

      “The sappers exploded their charges under the city walls, and the invader’s troops swarmed in through the gap.”

      • nshibj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I would understand that “swarm” here is used as a noun, destroy is the verb. The verb uses the third-person singular form (destroys) therefore the subject can’t be “1 million antelopes” (plural), but should be singular, like “one swarm of antelopes”.