The Army will now allow recruits to enlist up to age 42 and has removed a waiver requirement for those with a marijuana-related conviction.

  • kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d rather snort cocaine right in front of the MEPS people and end up in prison than ever fight for this bastard.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    As unemployment continues to increase under the MAGA turds, they might receive more recruits. However, not enough to occupy and police Iran, which will require a military draft.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    They’re going to have to really redo their advertising if they’re going to attract stoners. All that advertising is about how you can see the world (and then blew it up) and get free training (in skills that are utterly useless outside of the military) and become a hero (by having your legs blown off).

    All of that sounds like way too much hard work. I just want to do my 8 hours and then go home. Also virtually every civilian job pays better. It’s amazing anyone joins up.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wonder if this will bring out all those big macho MAGAs, eager to fight for Dear Leader?

    Yeah. And Neil Breen will win Best Director next year.

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’d have to go to military fat camp first, and then enlisted into the crutch brigade, as copied from the current Russian model.

    • RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      They can still fuck with a lot of people without a draft though.

      Most U.S. enlistment contracts have a period of four years in the inactive ready reserves (IRR) after the normal four years of active duty. Not to mention the active reserves and national guard.

      That’s a lot of people leading otherwise normal, mostly civilian lives, that could get called up. Granted, that’s not the same as a straight up draft - all of those people choose to sign up in some capacity.

      But we have a lot of bodies on tap to churn through the human meat grinder before a draft.

      Isn’t that exciting and reassuring?

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s not how that works. Both of my little brothers were in different branches of the military, and they had to make a choice to decide if they’d re-sign after their 4 year enlistment.

        • RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          That is how it works, I was in the U.S. military.

          The choice your brothers were given at the end of their four years was whether or not to sign up for another four years of active duty. Their initial contract was almost certainly actually for eight years, including four years active duty and four years IRR.

          People don’t talk about the IRR because there are nearly zero requirements during that time, it’s not the same as the active reserves. No reporting in, no fitness, medical, or training standards, etc. It just means you’re among the first on the hook if ol’ uncle sam “needs” more people ASAP, and they can legally recall you to active duty without instituting a draft.

          There are exceptions for some job roles and other circumstances, but that’s how the standard enlistment works.

            • RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              What the hell just happened? You admitted you had incorrect information and accepted the correction in a mature and civil manner?

              Nah, you’re supposed to dig in and argue for hours. Maybe go through my post history to inspire some ad hominem attacks. Throw in some slurs if you’re feeling feisty.

              I guess I’ll just go back to work if you’re going to help foster an environment of constructive dialogue like that.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      A draft is the only method the US has of actually invading and occupying Iran. We literally don’t have enough troops to do it with a volunteer army.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Except it’s the only way of actually toppling the Iranian government. That’s why this is quickly turning into another Vietnam. Vietnam was a quagmire because we couldn’t actually invade and occupy North Vietnam without dragging the Chinese into it like in the Korean War. So we were stuck trying to fight an air war and and indirect ground campaign from within South Vietnam. It’s the same exact dynamic with Iran. We can’t practically do the thing actually required to win. So we’re just stuck in an endless meat grinder as the Iranian government proves yet again that you can’t topple a government via air strikes. And national pride won’t let us just pack up and leave. It’s Vietnam all over again. Can’t win. Can’t leave. Just stuck there until our political will finally breaks.