• flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    ….I am asking others why they are ok with 2 but not ok with 2000. Are you being thick on purpose?

    • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Who said they were “ok with 2”? You just fantasized that

      Even then, you’d have to be pretty thick to equate that to 20k

      • flandish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not equating. Scaling. The folks who are not upset that ICE murdered 2 but also still think Iran is evil because they got 2000… means there has to be some sort of number where they turn a corner and think “ok bad.”

        You can’t seem to read what I am saying without forming a reply that indicates you choose to be thick.

        I’ll make it simple before I end the thread:

        Anyone who is Ok with any number greater than zero is a piece of shit and 2 is as bad as 2000 because once you step off from zero there is no going back and the path to 2000 is only a matter of time.

        • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          But who are you referring to that is ‘not upset with 2’?

          You just made that up as an excuse for yourself not to worry about the 20.000

          • flandish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            i said I speak to people- as in people in real life. like meatspace. there are a shit ton of right wing assholes who are proud of what ice does but also think iran is shitty for what they do to protestors.