President Donald Trump on Wednesday acknowledged that his tariffs could result in fewer and costlier products in the United States, saying American kids might “have two dolls instead of 30 dolls,” but he insisted China will suffer more from his trade war.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Even if this were true, a policy that hurts everyone isn’t sucessful just because someone else suffers more than you.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      When your worldview is completely transactional, and you believe that literally everything is zero-sum, then you do view that as successful.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          No, see, you start with the assumption that everything is zero-sum, then you look at the other guy to see suffering and conclude that you must therefore be winning.

    • Lembot_0002@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      If your suffering is negligibly small and your opponent’s – critical for him, then you can demand something.

      Imagine a war where all sides are losing soldiers but one side is winning.

      But in the case of China I’m not sure who will suffer more in the long run.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        But in the case of China I’m not sure who will suffer more in the long run.

        Consumers in both countries, as it always is with tariffs.

        • Lembot_0002@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I doubt that Chinese customers depend much on imports from the USA. They might feel the overall slowering the economy until China finds a new destination for its goods, but that’s it.

          • Rin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Well, they need work in factories which produce goods for the US customers. If no one is going to buy those goods, these people will be out of a job.

            src

            • Lembot_0002@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              14 hours ago

              until China finds a new destination for its goods

              Yes, but the USA isn’t the only market. It was convenient because of its size, but nothing irreplaceable.

              • Rin@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                You realise that the companies that will no longer want to produce in China because of the tariffs will move to India or Vietnam or literally anywhere else? Kinda like Apple and Samsung are doing.

                • Lembot_0002@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  And? Some will move, others – won’t. Moving industry is a huge deal. It isn’t easy. And most companies understand that the problem is not China but Trump. Today Americans are required to pay additional taxes for Chinese stuff, tomorrow they will pay for Indian stuff.

                  Maybe you have some real numbers to analyze?