• cartoon meme dog@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    does it destroy the actual glass cable, or does it get inside and travel along the optic path and burn out the transceiver? burning the glass to breaking point seems like it would take a heck of a lot of energy, so i assumed it was attacking the light sensors at each end of the line, but people keep saying it’s actually breaking the glass.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      On the case of the real drone, the laser is destroying the cable.

      On the OP’s case, yes a laser can interrupt the communication. But the drone needs to keep sending it, or the drone will just continue after it’s gone. On the other hand, you need less power.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          If you can inject commands into a communication line, somebody was really stupid while designing it.

          • einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Well those fiber optic line end points are not exactly encrypted, they use off the shelf components like HDMI over Fiber adapters, and serial over fiber for control link. In rare cases they could maybe use a actual IP connection over fiber but i doubt that since, it would add overhead, latency and make the hardware setup a lot more complex and expensive (if would be able to encrypt tho).

  • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Now try to fit enough batteries to power that laser on a drone lol (spoiler: you can’t)

      • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        ok so the giant battery is in the tank, guess how big a cable would have to be? You’re not putting that on a quad

        edit: it’s also impractical as hell to tether drones when most roads get netting installed over them, just saying

        edit2: why not just put the laser on the tank? fry the drones around you directly instead of hoping you cut the comms in the fiber optic lines

        • Teh@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It wouldn’t have to run at full power all the time, just when actively defending against a drone. There are lots of other harder to solve issues.

          • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Ok and? Still needs batteries and cables to withstand peak power, still needs to be tethered somehow, still needs another crew member constantly flying it. Not to mention being this close to combat and to the ground, you better have some insanely good lens protectors or that laser is gonna be out of commission after any shrapnel lodges itself in.

            Completely made up idea to counter this made up idea, but if you’re putting it on armor - a 12 gauge turret sounds so much easier. Doesn’t need a shitload of power, can put it onto a generic stand/turret base, targeting is easier and you’re guaranteed to ruin the enemy drone’s life

          • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I can show you a chunky 500W cable for a pc power supply, would be just as relevant. Look up cables of actual laser power supplies, they’re big and relatively dense, and we’re talking about tethering a quad, it’s not gonna fly well with that dangling.

              • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Not a man but I take your point, consider that this drone and the cable is gonna get peppered like crazy. Plus you don’t want it tangling up

                • jfrnz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Apologies, I had meant “man” as person but I recognize that usage is dated. No gender assumption was intended.