• digredior@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    There is something to be said for age and experience. I think a large part of the reason why executives in the corporate world, and in politics, is it usually takes a lifetime to get yourself into a position to take on the role in the first place.

    In principle, I have no issue with someone in their 60’s being the POTUS. A 65 year old in good physical health should also have more than adequate cognitive function to do the job.

    If I have any issues with someone that age in that role, it’s that they’ve likely lost touch with the needs of the people who elected them.

    • Xaphanos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      From personal experience, I can tell you that being over 40 when you have a kid is a huge benefit. More patience, more money, more acceptance. Young parents tend to be emotionally unprepared for the challenges.

      I’m over 60. My wife and I have a great trusting relationship with our teen son. He comes to us with concerns and problems. We encourage him to have all the room he wants to have his independent life. He is involved in all major decisions.

      Maturity certainly has strong benefits. It is unfortunate that it also comes as the body begins to decay.

      My grandmother died of Alzheimer’s - her mind failed long before her body. We are caring for a relative with Parkinson’s - her body has failed long before her mind.

      It is best to take the individual into account. It would also be great if the lying of politicians was a prosecutable offense.