Former GOP operative Scott Leiendecker just bought Dominion Voting Systems, giving him ownership of voting systems used in 27 states. Election experts have concerns.

  • dellish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    2 days ago

    How the fuck is the election infrastructure even allowed to be privately owned?? I know the US is a capitalist country but fuck me, there have to be limits. For the democracy the US seems to enjoy forcibly spreading around the world to work, elections MUST be independent and verifiable. The fact anyone thinks it’s OK that this infrastructure can be bought and sold is just mind-boggling.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Capitalism does not require democracy. In fact democracy stands in the way of the incentives people who own significant capital have. Soooo, if democracy stands in the way of profit growth… it might have to go. 🥹 It happens gradually. We say there’s got to be a limit. They say OK and negotiate where the limit is. Sometime later they ask to renegotiate the limit a bit in their favour. We say, not a big deal, fine. Rinse and repeat until the limit has changed enough for them not to have to ask. They just try doing it without us noticing. Then at some point we start noticing. By then our democratic power is eroded to the point where shifting the limit in our favour is extremely difficult.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    2 days ago

    Voting systems should be owned by the public and open source. This shit shouldn’t even be possible but the US and this current regime especially actually fucken hate freedom and love corporate dick. Fuck this country.

    • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fuck this country.

      Counterpoint: the US is a fixer-upper democracy worth restoring… then consensually fucking for the enjoyment of all those involved.

    • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s no reason for them to be digital at all. The UK has secure elections with hand-counting paper ballots.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        As skeptical as I am about all of this, the new owner does supposedly want to move to 100% paper ballot. Is this just something he says to buy favor though? Idk.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m aware of the lies. I said as much in my comment. Still, they say they want paper ballots, and I support that move. It shouldn’t have been sold to this person, but if they actually do follow through and at least have paper copies of all ballots on their machines that would be a nice benefit, but doesn’t outweigh the negatives. However, that’ll probably be in a move to remove mail-in voting, or other things that enable minotirty groups to vote more easily.

    • hypna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I thought about this for a second, and I don’t actually think being open source would do any good. It’s not like we can compile and run our own voting booths. There’s no way to know what’s actually running in the machine at your polling place.

      And voting machines are publicly owned, but perhaps you meant designed and manufactured by the government?

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        What? Its for authenticity and verification purposes not to pull your own down, compile, and run it. Voting Machines are not publicly owned. Specifically, they are owned by public companies and corporations who run them. Like Dominion just got bought out to be Liberty Vote.

      • arin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not the designed and manufactured by this current government tho… Fucking corrupt as fuck

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Guys, I’m beginning to question the rationale behind outsourcing all our election infrastructure to for-profit industry.

    Might have been a big mistake.

  • Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Genuine question for the business people here. Would it have been possible to say no to this sale? If I remember correctly, publicly traded companies have to do certain things for their shareholders but I would assume you could essentially say no of you had reservations about the sale for ethical/financial reasons right?

    I am not sure if Dominion is publicly traded but I have to wonder about this sale given the lawsuits they went through and won as well as the pending ones.