• utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Love that quote “We’re going to search your house. We don’t have a warrant, but we paid your landlord $100 to give us a spare key. So now we’re searching your house without a warrant,” by Laperruque

  • Nathan_TheAuthor@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The warrant is dead. Privacy is now a luxury, not a right. We’ve officially entered the 2026 digital monitoring grid where ‘data’ is the new currency for control. This isn’t just news; it’s the ‘Exodus’ of our personal sovereignty in real-time

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Don’t put Sim cards in your phones, folks.

    Block ads. Only use apps in froid and official Foss repos

  • stringere@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can we crowdfund buying data on congress, the Epstein class and their chdren, and the Trump crime syndicate so that it can be made freely publicly available?

  • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Citizens: You can’t spy on me without a legal reason!

    Govt: I know, but they can.

    (big tech giants appear with decades of data)

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      It is one of the big lies of capitalist countries like the U.S.

      “Don’t worry [CITIZEN ID] you have rights! The constitution says you do”

      But then everyone is coerced to working for companies that are closer to miniature dictatorship kingdoms, with some of them being more powerful than “legitimate” governments.

    • TyrionBean@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Some of it is, I’m sure. But the reason I posted it was because it had a lot of detailed information which I hadn’t seen before. It was literally my first post on Lemmy today, other than comments. I hope I didn’t make a faux pas.

      • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sorry, you were right to post it, I am just saying this is an ongoing thing we have those of us who followed the news have known about for quite some time. Just this last summer or so there was An article In This Very intercept detailing how the feds were streamlining the buying of data broker info and distributing it to agencies, previously agencies bought it individually and many bought the same tranches of information separately.

        The whole thing is fucked. It’s a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment we all know it but the goddamned federal courts are fucking traitors and deserve, something something.

        • TyrionBean@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well, the good news for me personally is that since a year, I’ve been getting off of the American tech stack, hosting in Europe, with .eu domains, using aliases for emails on my own email server, locking down my stuff, and erasing what there is from iCloud, Google, etc… Completely. I wrote a long basic how-to a month ago to help others, and have been meaning to update it more. I’ve also been migrating my startup company’s setup to do the same. It’s all done now and I couldn’t be happier with the results. I’ve also been encouraging others online and friends and family to do the same. I even have a few of them using my Nextcloud server nearly full time now.

          So I am trying to help. 😃

          • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            The fourth amendment was dead long before the Patriot Act. From the crime waves in the 80s if not late 70s.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          the judiciary is comprised of useful idiots that care more about the law than humanity.

  • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    What always freaks me out is people considering their government worse than the likes of Meta, Palantir, Google, Microsoft… At least you can vote (hopefully) for a different government. The problem is when the companies are able to buy governments, like USA is.

    • catdog@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      People are stuck in web 1.0 and web 2.0 thought patterns when it comes to privacy.

      • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’re not kidding, that’s for sure.

        My wife watched a video about ICE surveillance last night and she couldn’t believe they are building databases or protestors or holding airport photos of immigrants for 75 years. Normies do not understand just how bad it is, they think pointing out all this stuff is crazy conspiracy theory.

        100% of the data is out there for every single action we do now. Everything we say (smartphones, ‘smart’ devices), Where we are driving, when we are driving, when we are out and about, who we are with, who we exchange messages with, how much money we make, what we spend it on, everything we comment on the internet, all of our browser history, every message we exchange on nearly all platforms… everything is for sale. 1984 is technically feasible, today. We’re so close it’s terrifying.

        • JoeMontayna@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I started talking to a friend about this and he called me a tin foil hat wearing conspiracist and said even if it’s true him and his company is making money off of it so he doesn’t care.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      You can vote for the party that supports Meta/Palantir/Google/Microsoft or you can vote for the other party that supports Meta/Palantir/Google/Microsoft

        • WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Maybe you should look at who has been expanding the surveillance state for the past 25 years, because it’s essentially a bipartisan issue in Congress and all administration. Edit to expand on my point, but the Democrats continued sycophancy to giant corporations and refusal to enact policies to benefit actual people is why America has accelerated towards fascism for the past 30 years.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Agreed. But the point they’re making (wittingly or unwittingly) isn’t “they’re both directly and indirectly responsible for the rise of the surveillance state.”

            The fundamental point is: “Both parties are the same because of this one issue.” And that position is reductive to the point of being indistinguishable from the positions of centrists and conservatives, both of which often prefer easy-to-digest, broad-stroke politics over wrestling with the nuances.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Thanks for putting words in my mouth and talking down to me.

              No, the point I’m making is that both parties serve the same masters. Look at who Meta/Palantir/Google/Microsoft donate to, do you think they’re wasting their money when they give millions and millions to both parties?

              • Telorand@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                No, the point I’m making is that both parties serve the same masters.

                To what end? What’s the logical conclusion people should draw from this?

                …do you think they’re wasting their money when they give millions and millions to both parties?

                I mean, yes, but to which party do they give more? You’re essentially saying “follow the money.” Here’s where the money went in 2024. You’ll note that the top eight biggest donors gave to Republicans.

                They might serve the same masters, but the masters have favorites and not by accident.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  To what end? What’s the logical conclusion people should draw from this?

                  Instead of only engaging in politics every few years when its time to vote, people should be politically active all year and engaged in struggle in the workplace and on the streets. Minneapolis shows the way - they didn’t vote to get rid of Kristi Noem, they forced her out by taking to the streets and by launching a general strike. Voting might be part of a larger strategy, but only part of one.

                  I mean, yes, but to which party do they give more?

                  Tech companies and people who work in tech tend to give more to Democrats. Palatir is an exception to this general rule, but Meta/Alphabet/Microsoft were mostly behind Harris in the 2024 election. Does this surprise you for some reason?