• dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Actually, it’s been quite well documented that the laye night shows are not the profit engine they used to be, and Colbert’s show might have been legit losing money. Its hard to find hard data on this, particularly after it all got so politicized. But I did find this, which shows that late night ad revenue is much lower than it has been 10 years ago

      https://www.axios.com/2023/04/28/late-night-tv-corden-ratings-decline

      People simply aren’t as likely to wait and watch a thing live when you can always stream it after the fact

    • calliope@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Kimmel and Colbert the hosts were. The shows were barely breaking even. Do you know a lot of people who watch late night shows? I don’t.

      The old TV networks (ABC, CBS) aren’t being bought by vultures because they’re super successful

      Here’s a Paramount exec complaining how little YouTube pays, because that’s where a lot of views come from.

      • Zephorah@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I watch them on YouTube. As I’ve said, we don’t have a TV in the house. In addition, we don’t do ads.

        Colbert’s more my humor, not Kimmel, but it’s fun. Some of the last network tv worth watching. Like pulling up SNL weekend update every week, in season.