I think they were joking about that like people say someone committed suicide with two shots to the back of the head. But thanks for posting that article, it does say the coroner didn’t find any evidence of assault so far.
Nah, there’s a pile of misinformation circulating on social media claiming that the deceased had broken arms / legs / bruises / etc.
People unthinkingly gobble it up because it fits their world view. Farther down in the comments here you can find people already claiming that it’s a cover-up / conspiracy because the Coroner’s Statement (he’s black BTW) doesn’t jive with what they want to believe.
I really wish more people learned the lesson from Columbine where the media narrative from the start and the eventual FBI psych profile were at extreme odds with each other. Many crimes fit this mold where our initial impression is not what actually happened.
The comment you are referring to is unedited and ends with a /s
Commonly used as a tag for sarcasm in case they thought someone may mistake it for being serious.
True, I was surprised that there were so many comments tagged with a /s in this comment section. Normally I’ll see like one, there were a plethora in this comment section.
Maybe but let’s wait for a reliable source before citing somethong transparently aligned, unqualified to know what a defensive wound looks like, and known for lying-like a coroner.
I genuinely cannot think of a less reliable source.
they’ll call it a suicide and keep the last acknowledgement in the 80’s.
Yup.
Dude had defensive wounds like bruises and a broken arm. Anyways, it’s definitely suicide, so we don’t have to look into it any further /s
Well yeah. Look at people who try and fail to kill themselves. Usually no fresh defensive wounds. Clearly that’s what they’re always missing.
Citation needed especially since the Coroner’s department has specifically refuted this.
I think they were joking about that like people say someone committed suicide with two shots to the back of the head. But thanks for posting that article, it does say the coroner didn’t find any evidence of assault so far.
Nah, there’s a pile of misinformation circulating on social media claiming that the deceased had broken arms / legs / bruises / etc.
People unthinkingly gobble it up because it fits their world view. Farther down in the comments here you can find people already claiming that it’s a cover-up / conspiracy because the Coroner’s Statement (he’s black BTW) doesn’t jive with what they want to believe.
I really wish more people learned the lesson from Columbine where the media narrative from the start and the eventual FBI psych profile were at extreme odds with each other. Many crimes fit this mold where our initial impression is not what actually happened.
The comment you are referring to is unedited and ends with a /s Commonly used as a tag for sarcasm in case they thought someone may mistake it for being serious.
Yes, but it could be read that only the final sentence was being said sarcastically. Even with the context of the rest of the conversation.
True, I was surprised that there were so many comments tagged with a /s in this comment section. Normally I’ll see like one, there were a plethora in this comment section.
Maybe but let’s wait for a reliable source before citing somethong transparently aligned, unqualified to know what a defensive wound looks like, and known for lying-like a coroner.
I genuinely cannot think of a less reliable source.
Well, cops said cops are innocent. Must be true.
That’s not what was said. What they claim is that there are no defensive wounds. The police aren’t suspected in this case at this time.