A U.S. appeals court on Friday declared unconstitutional a nearly 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling, calling it an unnecessary and improper means for ​Congress to exercise its power to tax.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of ‌Appeals in New Orleans ruled in favor of the nonprofit Hobby Distillers Association and four of its 1,300 members.

They argued that people should be free to distill spirits at home, whether as ​a hobby or for personal consumption including, in one instance, to create ​an apple-pie-vodka recipe.

The ban was part of a law passed during ⁠Reconstruction in July 1868, in part to thwart liquor tax evasion, and subjected violators ​to up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Actually no: there are no courses, licensing, rules, or regulations for a hobbyist […] If we had to ban everything that had a chance of causing harm to people, shouldn’t we ban gas stoves?

    Why did you jump from “courses, licensing, rules or regulations” to “ban everything”? Those are two completely different arguments.

    The companies who build gas stoves for public use should 100% be regulated.

    • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Because this is a thread about a reversal on a ban on distilling. My original comment mentioned all of those hobbies outside of any context of regulation/licensing due to the high risks inherent in their activities without any restrictions in place.

      Responder tried to argue that they all have restrictions. I said that it was false and then reiterated my main point, which is being glad (as a member of the homebrew community) that home distilling is now allowed, banning it was dumb, and everyone screaming in this thread about keeping it banned because of “dAnGeR” is unreasonable