• AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I have to disagree with this unfortunately. Myself and many of my friends all make $160k or more each, but when it comes to life’s debts and surprises, family, medical bills, etc. - $160k is not enough. And that’s with me renting a room from family and not even really saving for retirement yet.

    • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yup, we make in that neighborhood. We live comfortably and frugally, and we still can’t just do what we want. We don’t sweat small purchases as much, and are upgrading things quicker than when we made less than half of that. But we still need to be smart about what we spend, especially with inflation the last few years.

    • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The fuck are doing with your money? Ive never made more than £35k a year. And debt free at 47 with a fully paid off 3 bedroom detached house and fancy as fuck german car.

      • AlfredoJohn@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        See that euro symbol in front of your currency those of us with dollars do not have good public transportation, we have to pay extreme amounts for health care and health insurance, we dont have public college for free or low cost, our housing is predatory, car centric infrastructure design necessitates car ownership with another high cost insurance, the car market has become predatory and ridiculously priced to the point its even inflated the used car market to match the prices of what new cars should be. There are numerous reasons the US salaries look better on paper than they do in reality. Should $160k a year be a great salary that leaves you with surplus, it really should and i wish that were the case. Even if you were to be able to secure a salary like that in a low cost of living area in the US it would go a decent distance but the problem being the places where that is the case usually have bad health care, shitty public schooling, lack of access to quality food, etc. which means most of those areas arent ideal for those with families unless they want to pay exorbitant amounts for private school, transportation costs to get to a location with quality health care access in the event they need it etc. Its not as straightforward as you think. We need major help across the pond here, and most people have become so brainwashed and dumbed down from our shitty education systems that they are willingly voting against their own interests because they believe the propaganda that one day they might be a billionaire.

        • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          26 minutes ago

          Thats a pound sign, not a euro sign.

          We have healthcare, but we pay for it in taxes. Our housing costs are just as fucked as yours.

          Stop making excuses for being shit with money.

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Doesn’t the UK also have expensive housing? I’m guessing you bought 27 years ago? Wise move.

      • AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I tried to start / invest in 4 businesses prior to COVID and lost everything and then some.

        That’s part of it. I’ll be paying for that the rest of my life probably.

        But even ignoring most things related to that, $160k wouldn’t be enough and my wife and I don’t even have kids.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      What’s the net income? $160k after paltry long-term capital gains tax is going to go a lot further than a single person being taxed fully.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        What’s the net income? $160k after paltry long-term capital gains tax is going to go a lot further than a single person being taxed fully.

        • Federal Income tax of $160,000/year from long term capital gains: $24,000
        • Federal Income tax of $160,000/year from ordinary income (without FICA and Medicare): $ 27,938.50

        So in this case its only a $3938.50 cent difference between federal taxation on ordinary income vs capital gains income.

        State and local taxes are all over the place for capital gains. My State, as an example, treats any capital gains income as ordinary income at the full tax rate.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          FICA and Medicare count. But then so does health insurance premiums.

          I don’t think there’s anywhere in the world where you can’t get by on $160k. There are plenty of places where it can be tight, especially if the comparison is just a number of your choice.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            “can’t get by on $160k” is changing the original premise. The original claim by that poster was: “My point is that $160k is enough for anybody. That much per person would give any household a very comfortable lifestyle even in a HCOL area.”

            “get by” ≠ “very comfortable lifestyle even in a HCOL area”