• SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    You’re taking out too much tax. Closer to $9,300.

    A household of two adults would have $320k gross annually, so twice that.

    Also, I’m comfortably supporting two adults in a HCOL area, with a mortgage and high medical bills, for under $125k annually.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      A household of two adults would have $320k gross annually, so twice that.

      You don’t think that’s moving the goalpost just a bit by doubling the number of earners?

      Also, I’m comfortably supporting two adults in a HCOL area, with a mortgage and high medical bills, for under $125k annually.

      I’d be interested to hear how you’re accomplishing that. At a minimum, can I ask what your housing costs are?

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I changed nothing about my original comment. I said per person, not household.

        Mortgage payment is currently $5,500 / mo. Note that this is not an income of $125k annually, but net expenses as recorded over the past few years.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I changed nothing about my original comment. I said per person, not household.

          *Single people need not apply

        • tomkatt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Because you can’t work forever. Burnout, aging, illness, etc. Life happens. Or do you plan to live paycheck to paycheck into your 70s?

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Again, that’s separate from living expenses. In my personal example, I am maxing out my retirement accounts, but those amounts are not counted as part of my family’s annual cost of living.

        • naught@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I’m just thinking about the “take home” figure! 160k doesn’t stretch as far as I thought it did when I was a kid

          • tomkatt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            I thought $40k was more than enough when I was a kid. But that was when you could buy a house for $30k to $50k. By the time I hit my 20s, inflation already had homes at closer to $100k, and the cost of everything much higher than when I was a kid.

            When I was growing up I didn’t know anyone making more than $50k, most made less, and they were doing fine, owning homes, etc. $160k was wealthy.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You’re taking out too much tax. Closer to $9,300.

      [Citation needed]

      I cited my source for the taxation in my post above as well as the rate. Feel free to cite yours for discussion.