• I_Jedi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Ah! Excellent question.

      It is estimated that there are 92 million people living in Iran. The price of a human, ignoring the human’s net worth, has a lower bound of 1 million USD (based off the heart alone).

      With some simple math, it can be deduced that Iran currently holds at least 92 trillion dollars of human wealth.

      Since Iran is considered to be an enemy of the US, that 92 trillion is subtracted off of the US GDP (~30.5 trillion USD), which puts the US in the red.

      Therefore, Trump must reduce Iran’s stockpiles of human wealth to get the US GDP to at least break even.

      I am sure you understand, now that I put this in this very logical way.

      /s if there’s any confusion

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Are you aware how many people could be saved with 2 billions worth of social programs and healthcare?

        • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Not specifically but I know it’s a lot. Doesn’t reduce our obligation to rescue the people our country puts in harm’s way (for good reasons or bad).

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Doesn’t change the fact that 2 billion could save a lot of people if the money was allocated for that instead of war.

            • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Yeah, I get it. After Afghanistan, I heard we spent $7 trillion, and got literally no outcome. Everything was essentially the same as when we started, 20 years before. Think of what we could have done with $7 trillion over 20 years…

              • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                Yes, it’s so sad how USA has lost obvious opportunities to improve the lives of their population, actually not much different from Russia. The money was there, they were just spend on making the rich richer and to build an expensive military.