• Default_Defect@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    My favorite part of the linux experience is the FREEDOM, but also being talked down to for not using my freedom correctly, I should only do things a specific way or I might as well just use windows.

    • Ferk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      You are mixing different ideas of freedom. Software freedom is not the same as freedom of choice of software.

      You don’t need Linux to have choices of what software to use, you have that in most (all?) proprietary systems, in some you might even have more choices than in Linux… even if it includes proprietary software.

      This is analogous to how being a free person (not a slave) is not the same as having freedom to choose who to work for, even if some of them are slavers (ie. having freedom to choose your master).

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s extremely context-dependent.

      If we’re talking about enterprise-grade, five-nines reliability: I want the absolute simplest, bare-bones, stripped down, optimized infra I can get my hands on.

      If we’re talking about my homelab or whatever else non-critical system: I’m gonna fuck around and play with whatever I feel like.

    • brax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because using your freedom to promote options that restrict freedom means helping to remove your freedom. But hey, what do the Linux elders know? Clearly the new people into Linux are far smarter…

    • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You don’t have to do as they say but doing so lets you talk down to others who aren’t. So it’s a fair trade.