No, i’m saying 90% of intellectual discourse is at least influenced by religion because it comes from people who are religious
why not suggest that all of intellectual discourse is influenced by primatism because it comes from people who are primates?
what a goofy argument.
and the idea that you posit atheists can’t enjoy poetry because the poetry relies on religious appreciation is hideous.
you religious nutbags will attempt to co-opt anything. it’s fucking gross. stop calling yourself an agnostic if you spout this shit, it’s like a nazi saying they’re strict socialists.
But you can’t get to the meat of most intellectual discourse if you dismiss religion, just like you can’t get to the meat of most physics if you dismiss math.
you know you have the option to just exchange ideas with other humans right ? fucking half cocked pseudo intellectual reaching for insults at the first 3 syllable word. what a bore.
why not suggest that all of intellectual discourse is influenced by primatism because it comes from people who are primates?
what a goofy argument.
and the idea that you posit atheists can’t enjoy poetry because the poetry relies on religious appreciation is hideous.
you religious nutbags will attempt to co-opt anything. it’s fucking gross. stop calling yourself an agnostic if you spout this shit, it’s like a nazi saying they’re strict socialists.
ridiculous.
you know you have the option to just exchange ideas with other humans right ? fucking half cocked pseudo intellectual reaching for insults at the first 3 syllable word. what a bore.
it’s telling that you think my reply was an insult, but that your flawed premises weren’t insulting, and intellectually devoid of any meaning.
of course you find it boring, most of this discourse has escaped you entirely.