• SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    He knows some troops would literally just go and kill their commanders.

    I’m not sure this works how you think it works. Military members aren’t prohibited from owning guns, they just have to store them and check them out to go shoot. There’s been plenty of shootings on military bases with personal firearms because unless you fully search every car coming in, you won’t stop someone from bringing one in.

    If idiots are carrying around off duty it’s more likely to cause a drunken bar shooting than a fragging incident.

    Also also the memo literally says it’ll let everyone “request” to carry, implying some level of commander is the one to approve it.

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      But if the commanders are sycophants, then only certain requests to carry are approved.

      It could easily engender a situation where the commander plays favorites to create power imbalances and danger for whoever happens to be in the out group. We’ve also recently learned that Hegseth has meddled a lot with military promotions, targeting specific groups for career suppression.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      You’re really making the mistake that “how things worked” in the past are how things will work moving forward.

      First, do you think allowing everyone to have a gun at all times and no longer searching wouldn’t increase the likelihood of someone being able to go postal? But, that wasn’t even the point of my comment. Because I stated clearly that’s NOT what this order is doing. A lot of people keep misinterpreting it as such. So it’s why I addressed that. It was literally an example of what the order was NOT going to result in.

      Did you not read my comment or something? Or reply to the wrong one? My comment literally pointed out that this is still approval based. That was the entire point of my comment.

      And then I made the prediction that this is to build SS style grunts loyal to the cause and ensure they are the ones armed at all times.

      I never said anything about stopping personal ownership either. I’m not sure where you hallucinated that part from…

      It’s like you’re responding to someone else but quoting me…

      Searches and current gun control will likely increase and go hand in hand with this order to further ensure the SS grunts are the ones running the bases and even dealing with higher ranked leaders if they are seen as not loyal.

      And I swear to God if you reply with “that’s not how that works”. You’re not paying attention to how ICE operates and how our current fascist state does not give a fuck about “how stuff works”.

    • apftwb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      In a video posted to X, Hegseth said he is signing a memo that will direct base commanders to allow requests for troops to carry privately owned firearms “with the presumption that it is necessary for personal protection.”

      He said any denial of a service member’s request must be explained in detail and in writing.

      My interpretation is that they will be allowed to open carry personal weapons anywhere on base. Any denial of any member’s request will likely be appealable and a higher authority at the DoD will ensure that the “right people” get to open carry.

      I could not find the actual memo.