• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    It wouldn’t be very strategically important to the US on its own, but it currently is strategically important to NATO and harmful to Russia.

    Getting NATO out of Greenland is Putin’s order.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Absolutely absurdity that has to stop. Greenland is far away from Russia. Fine, some possible ICBM missile trajectories go over Greenland, but NATO is not going to stop US from putting missile shield or offensive nukes in Greenland, as long as it stays under NATO oversight. The Putin Derangement Syndrome that extends to explaining all Trump actions as gifts to Russia needs to stop being said out loud. Pure CIA disinformation to somehow brainwash Europe into accepting this.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        It’s about Naval access to the Atlantic. The Russian Navy has to go between Greenland and Norway. With NATO controlling both sides, they don’t have a route to the Atlantic through friendly waters.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          There are international waters between Iceland and UK. When US is part of NATO, with as a matter of fact, dictatorial control over NATO, ownership of Greenland doesn’t matter. It is only a severance of US/NATO alliance that makes Greenland matter.