• 3 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 13th, 2025

help-circle

  • Micro G is the worst option as it requires privileged access to your phone. This is the same major privacy issue with the regular Play Store. The only real difference is your shifting trust from Google to Micro G but, you shouldn’t be trusting any third party with that type of access.

    Aurora is a decent option as it allows you access to the Play Store without needing to actually install the Google Play Client.

    I would say sandboxed Google Play is the best option. You get full access to the play store while still having the protections of a sandboxed app.

    A lot of people will offer f-droid as an alternative but it also comes with some big issues. I’ll quote privacy guides here

    Due to their process of building apps, apps in the official F-Droid repository often fall behind on updates. F-Droid maintainers also reuse package IDs while signing apps with their own keys, which is not ideal as it gives the F-Droid team ultimate trust. Additionally, the requirements for an app to be included in the official F-Droid repo are less strict than other app stores like Google Play, meaning that F-Droid tends to host a lot more apps which are older, unmaintained, or otherwise no longer meet modern security standards.



  • I think easyoptouts is worth it ($20/quarter). It has like a 70% success rate which will decrease a ton of grunt work for you. There are a lot (well north of 150+) of these data sites to try and manage.

    Just because you remove data once does not mean it won’t be put back on the site later which means you need to make a habit of constantly rechecking the sites if you chose to do it yourself.

    I would also recommend signing up to have Google alert you when your name comes up in searches. This will make it easy to remove them from Google and let you know what you still have to remove.






  • I figured it out…

    Here is what I did (I am sure there are more efficient ways)

    1 - I left the I-am-PUID-0 setup how it is. What I mean is after I went through the guide and got it working I did not change anything to get RDT working.

    2 - I created a new docker-compose for RDT that uses the rclone mount from the I-am-PUID-0 guide. I did this because when I had them combined into one compose, RDT would work but Zurg did not. If I have them separated as different docker setups they both work.

    2a - Make sure you understand what the Download Path and Mapped Path are in RDT. The Download Path is the path inside the Docker container where files are downloaded. Whereas the Mapped path is the path on your host that is mapped to /data in the container.

    My docker compose for RDT is

    # version: "3.8"
    
    services:
      rdt-client:
        image: rogerfar/rdtclient
        container_name: rdtclient
        stdin_open: true # docker run -i
        tty: true        # docker run -t
        volumes:
          - /pd_zurg/mnt:/data  # Ensure this matches the pd_zurg mount
        environment:
          - RCLONE_UID=1000
          - RCLONE_GID=1000
          - TZ=America/New_York  # e.g., "America/New_York"
          - DOWNLOAD_DIR=/data/downloads  # Specify the download directory
        ports:
          - 6500:6500
        devices:
          - /dev/fuse:/dev/fuse:rwm
        cap_add:
          - SYS_ADMIN
        security_opt:
          - apparmor:unconfined
          - no-new-privileges
        restart: unless-stopped
    

    With this setup Zurg is grabbing anything I download from Real Debrid and adding it my Plex server. RDT via Sonarr is grabbing whatever shows I tell Sonarr to download via Torbox. All that has to be done is add the downloads folder as another library in Plex and voila.

    I am sure you could configure this to do more, I just wanted an option to grab shows on demand and make use of currently having two active debrid services. My use case is a bit odd and most likely not optimal for most but, hopefully this helps somebody.