I’m pretty sure you can pay for a lifetime access to infuse, cause I don’t think I pay monthly.
I’m pretty sure you can pay for a lifetime access to infuse, cause I don’t think I pay monthly.
So it’s inaccurate, but also top secret inaccurate. Why didn’t they fix the inaccuracy in the top secret report?
It handles memory just fine. I’ve run them all alongside each other for weeks with no issues (with a completely full hard drive from images). I rarely close programs or turn my computer off. Yes, an MBP is a great computer and well worth it, but they’re no where near as light and portable. If you’re doing image editing on the go then the air is a fantastic option.
In no world are 4+ year old cars with 20k kms on them “new”.
“Paperweight”/“chromebooks” yet can run davinci, Lightroom, PS, and IntelliJ at the same time? I mean complaining about the cost sure, but MacBook Air with the Mx chips are just as powerful as the old Intel MBPs, if not much more powerful.
That’s the news community. This is the world community
You used to be able to hold alt and right click and choose open.
That isn’t a Mac error message. It’s Roblox giving you that error.
It does, I’ve linked the exact section before, but I’m not the person you responded to. Just open the p25 document and search tariff.
No it’s a major typo. China raised tariffs to 85%. U.S. raised tariffs to 125%.
this is clearly reductionist. you can inherit that money and then utilize it effectively by donating it without destroying your ability to raise more money for donating. donating all your money means you have no investments to raise more money for donating. governments don’t do this, their goal is to spend taxpayer money to make the world a better place, while billionaires can only do the same if they keep an income stream.
The US’s largest “share” of exports to china vs other countries are soybeans and jet engines. China has spent the past decade and a half working to diversify their imports so this exact thing wouldn’t destroy their economy.
we had to invent /s because subtle sarcasm isn’t obvious. This wasn’t subtle. It was blatant, incredibly clear sarcasm. Poes law is talking about you in this situation. And the jk didn’t matter. they told you in their first reply to you
Um, you’re taking my comment way too seriously. I replied to a cartoon picture. I literally just made up a silly explanation that would fit the photos. Please take a deep breath and go touch some grass.
And then you proceeded to double down even harder on believing it wasn’t sarcasm. I’m guessing you were just having a terrible day so shake it off and move on.
You’ve clearly not been on the internet long if you can’t recognize the most basic of sarcasm. It’s literally a foundation of the internet.
You clearly put forth your unsubstantiated theory
you need better reading skills. their comment was incredibly clearly a joke. You’re the only one here that thought it was serious.
It was nothing more than a novelty after about a day and a half, even with the WiFi module.
Why isn’t it just deleted by default. A government that actually cared about its citizens wouldn’t let the data be sold off at all.
I mean that literally appletv. Barely costs more than a Roku and is vastly better than every other device on the market.
Did you read the link about privacy pass? I’m guessing not since you think that your searches are somehow tracked with that.
Ah I didn’t know that. I doubt it was that much when I first got it, but I’m unsure. I’ve had it for a long time