A letter to Hochul stating “I didn’t do it, you didn’t see me do it, you can’t prove it if I did do it, and no way was my deal with Trump a quid pro quo” qualifies as an opportunity to defend himself, as well.

Be my guest. I’d like to see how many of the words in your “explanation” fail to appear in the quoted section of the NYS Constitution.

Seems to me if the author meant a trial, they’d have used the word trial.

I’m sorry, I must be blind. Please point out the word “trial” in that section of the New York State Constitution.

All I see is “… after giving to such officer a copy of the charges against him and an opportunity to be heard in his defense.”

I didn’t miss a damn thing. The governor has a process available to dismiss him. That /\ is the process. Therefore, removing the mayor would not be extra judicial.

Quit moving the goal posts.

Such a removal would not be extra judicial: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PBO/33

I talked with a friend of mine from the City, who pointed out that Andrew Cuomo’s publicly announced his interest in the position, and apparently polled well (moreso than other options on the poll, at least).

Can’t say I’m keen on Cuomo running in a special election and winning. New York’s seen enough of him and his.

Bull turkey.

1st Amendment: Trump can’t order Google what to call any particular location. He can ask, Google can follow along (or not), and we can tell Google to get bent (or not).