And how will that help? The earliest when an entire country could reasonably expect to rely on nuclear power if they have no legal framework for it at all is probably in 30 years or so (20 years to build at least a few once the legal situation has been cleared up). How does that help the situation at all?
Business as usual.
Well, by the standards of the British Empire that could very well be considered true.
To be fair, most of the data they are based on are completely public too, like church or government records of births and deaths and similar events.
You are probably incredibly young but Israel has had a firm control of American politics for literally its entire existence. Both parties, all presidents, pretty much all senators and members of congress on every level of your government. Lying to your faces that they could change that at a whim because Israel is committing another atrocity this decade on top of the ones they did in the decades before would have been a reason not to vote for them because that would have clearly made them untrustworthy.
Not to mention that every single dictator the US installed in the last century or so was pro genocide too.
Banning stuff people actually want to do (or even better, have a deep instinctual desire to do like physical intimacy or sex) is what makes the whole “you are all sinners and we have the solution to sell to you” (or alternatively “you are all sinners and you have to do what we say to solve that”) part of the religion scam work.
But you (the people who pointed at the Gaza genocide as an important issue in the US election) didn’t ask that before the election, you strongly suggested that it only had an influence on one party despite all evidence pointing towards either both parties being influenced equally or the party who won (among other reasons) because of you being worse.
The ChatGPT part makes perfect sense, there is probably very little discussion in its training data of events like this so why would a statistical language generator make a statement like “content has been scrubbed from nasa.gov”?
If anything current could be called a prelude to a world war it would be America’s trade war against the rest of the world because virtually nothing else going on involves enough nations to qualify.
In the US it is almost like a double taboo too, they are rich and they are also the saints of the national religion of capitalism.
Negotiation is essentially an exercise in empathy, trying to put yourself in the other side’s shoes, moderating a negotiation is essentially the same thing twice. Is it any wonder that an egocentric person who only cares about himself is not good at it?
Apparently they were spared a world expo on top of all the other misery.
Russia is essentially a small state with a couple of centuries of imperialist thinking.
I would go one step further and remove all of the imperialist thinking in Russia, just to be on the safe side.
“Tazi-tech music” sounds like the kind of sounds someone might make when being hit by a taser.
I wonder if it is like character creation in an RPG, 5 minutes to elect a new pope and then the rest of the time is time they need to think of a name.
Pretty sure that doesn’t even cover the “just above the average wage” earner in most western countries though I suppose it depends a bit on if you count the parts that directly go to the government without even counting as gross wages (employer parts of social security, health care,…).
Still wouldn’t be worth it. We can’t expect Canadians to sacrifice themselves to the shitty US system, even the one without Trump.
Probably the same kind of ignorance of other countries’ perspective that makes Americans think the political center is somewhere between the US Republicans and the US Democrats.
I think if the Taiwan conflict ever goes hot Taiwan is going to lose no matter who “wins” just by being the battlefield and we can also forget about getting any chips from there.
But literally any other form of energy generation can be deployed quicker and is cheaper and most are also less centralized.