He will shut it down
- 0 Posts
- 48 Comments
org@lemmy.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•How can I use a local agentic LLM on Linux to debug code similar to Anthropic use of Claude to find vulnerabilities in Firefox?
0·4 days agoPretty sure if you have to ask how to do it, you’re not qualified to do it.
org@lemmy.orgto
News@lemmy.world•Dual citizens weigh Trump, taxes in decision to renounce U.S. citizenship
0·4 days agoSo much for being a “real American”
org@lemmy.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•The Ageless Device: Cheap gadgets for violating the California Digital Age Assurance Act
0·4 days agoTruck bomb is a terrible choice lmfao. You want to kill innocent people? Yikes.
org@lemmy.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•The Ageless Device: Cheap gadgets for violating the California Digital Age Assurance Act
0·4 days agoSee, talking about solutions just get shut down by people who don’t actually want solutions. If you think protesting and calling your bought-and-paid-for senator is ever going to change the world, you’re going to be very sad.
org@lemmy.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•The Ageless Device: Cheap gadgets for violating the California Digital Age Assurance Act
0·4 days agoI agree. This is a slippery slope. We need to assassinate each person pushing this law, and everyone who votes for it.
org@lemmy.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•The Ageless Device: Cheap gadgets for violating the California Digital Age Assurance Act
0·4 days agoBecause a bot can’t report an age?
org@lemmy.orgto
News@lemmy.world•Dual citizens weigh Trump, taxes in decision to renounce U.S. citizenship
0·4 days agoYou’re not doing shit.
lol “organizing” lol “protesting” lol it ain’t working.
org@lemmy.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•The Ageless Device: Cheap gadgets for violating the California Digital Age Assurance Act
0·5 days agoSounds like a Trump voter. 🤷♂️
org@lemmy.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•The Ageless Device: Cheap gadgets for violating the California Digital Age Assurance Act
0·5 days agoHave the day you voted for, trumpet
org@lemmy.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•The Ageless Device: Cheap gadgets for violating the California Digital Age Assurance Act
0·5 days agoYes, you’re a maga distraction lol glad we agree
The requirement to check age is on the provider. It is not the responsibility of the OS to store age and supply it freely to any service that wants it.
This data is stored as a non-privileged birth date.
This means any website can ask for your birth date. Then they store it, and use it for tracking. Private browser? HAH! Not your birth date!
This has N O T H I N G to do with “children.” It’s about Meta trying to escape moderation responsibility.
This is the right wing talking. Slowly putting identity into the OS for tracking. Don’t fall for it (unless you’re the right wing, and then fuck you)
org@lemmy.orgto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•Rant: Ageless Linux is YAUF (yet another unmaintained/useless Fork)
0·5 days ago“The world doesn’t revolve around California”
True, but OS level age verification is a politically conservative talking point. It was pushed by Meta.
Age verification is the responsibility of the PROVIDER (the one who needs to age check) and not on the OS level.
There seems to be a sharp divide between people who hold opposing views, and the right wing is largely behind OS level user identification. Today it’s birth date, tomorrow it’s birth gender.
None of this belongs at the OS level
org@lemmy.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•The Ageless Device: Cheap gadgets for violating the California Digital Age Assurance Act
0·5 days agoThe OS level age verification is being pushed by Meta to avoid having to take responsibility for moderation.
Where have you been?
org@lemmy.orgto
Linux@lemmy.ml•The Ageless Device: Cheap gadgets for violating the California Digital Age Assurance Act
0·5 days agoSo many magats wow
org@lemmy.orgto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•Rant: Ageless Linux is YAUF (yet another unmaintained/useless Fork)
0·5 days agoAnyone downplaying privacy.
Bet you a nickel he blows it up and calls it an Iranian attack.