

They lost 900,000 people last year due to low natality.
I try to contribute to things getting better, with sourced information, OC and polite rational skepticism.
Disagreeing with a point ≠ supporting the opposite side, I support rationality.
Let’s discuss to make things better sustainably.
Always happy to question our beliefs.
They lost 900,000 people last year due to low natality.
Does he still install them himself? Isn’t it likely he sent someone to do it for him?
Good to hear!
On the less positive side: one of the judges disagreed with everything, tens of thousands of supporter were supporting him in the street when the ruling happened, parliament allies are trying to make an amnesty law for him. I hope Brazilian people keep fighting for their democracy hard because the attacks will never stop.
Isn’t it the case of every Supreme Court? Which one has a jury?
The STA report comes days after a plane carrying Ursula von der Leyen was hit by interference.
The pilots of the European Commission president’s plane reportedly had to land using paper maps, but did so safely.
And one year later half of it breaks because of a Gnome update. Maybe you should have followed up the specific repo that warned that you needed to move to this new extension, or maybe it just went silent without explanation. Something like that.
At some point the problem is that land needs to be reclaimed for nature. Artificialiazitation of natural land is the first cause of biodiversity loss before pollution and climate warming. You actually don’t need to actively plant, give the land back to nature and let it do its thing.
I don’t think these parts can happen without the main diplomacy part.
Who would be able to take it away from them? They’ll do everything possible to keep them. Move it, buy politicians, etc.
A sufficient amount of people, it has happened a couple of time in history.
You mean trickle down and that bs?
Yes the belief in such thing. If we go back to early society, it could be agreeing to follow a leader because you believe you’ll get more resources from working for his group than by yourself.
People let those other people control resources, could it be because they shared the greed and thought they would benefit more from it by letting that happen?
Greed doesn’t need money it could be any resource. Would you have a source about the anthropologist claim?
How do you know people are not greedy by nature? Wasn’t it people who invented capitalism?
Greed
With a touch of what about the CIA.
The machines perform better with low temperature.
Sadly, it wouldn’t be surprising if they were already there. The International Consortium of Investigating Journalists (Panama Papers etc.) even has a specific hashtag for these operations, #ChinaTargets. https://www.icij.org/investigations/china-targets/china-transnational-repression-dissent-around-world/
Half of the targets interviewed by ICIJ and its media partners said the harassment extended to family members back home, who suffered intimidation and were interrogated by police or state security officials one or more times. Several victims told ICIJ that their family members in China or Hong Kong were harassed by police shortly after they had participated in protests or public events overseas. Sixty said they believed they had been followed or were targets of surveillance or spying by Chinese officials or their proxies; 27 said they were victims of an online smear campaign, and 19 said they had received suspicious messages or experienced hacking attempts, including by state actors. Some said their bank accounts in China and Hong Kong had been frozen. Officers from both the Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of State Security — two of the Chinese agencies with intelligence capacity — were responsible for intimidating some of the targets and their families, the testimonies show. Twenty-two people said they received physical threats or had been assaulted by civilian CCP supporters.
Some people put so much time and energy in this kind of stuff. Imagine we could harvest this level of motivation from everyone and put it at the service of the sustainable transition, we would have stopped global warming at the +1.5⁰C mark.
Not sure about peacefully, ethnic cleansing is a crime in any case, but it’s a notch down genocide. That’s why I was curious if the early theoricians mentioned something akin to it or not. So far, it seems they didn’t.
You think Le Monde is supporting the genocide because they are quoting? Isn’t it standard for a non-editorialized article?
If you check their section on Gaza, the opinion pieces (“tribune”) they published seem to be all supporting Gaza. https://www.lemonde.fr/la-guerre-de-gaza/