I’m glad they finally had an easy to understand example of why depending on a closed source ecosystem from a foreign country is insane for any kind of public authority.

My cousin in Darwin, OP also means original post, I got the joke. The comment was about the science behind, so that’s what I replied about.

It’s not clear apparently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junk_DNA.
Although OP seems to confuse non-coding DNA (the ~98%) and junk DNA. Some non-coding DNA has clearly identified roles, so it should be well below 98% of junk, and there’s a lot left to explore.

bUt It’S sTaBLe FoR neiGH

which meme

And it’s not even the worst thing about this person. She’s a Japanese was crime negationist.

Evangelion 2048, the Angels are Trump shaped.

You think Le Monde is supporting the genocide because they are quoting? Isn’t it standard for a non-editorialized article?
If you check their section on Gaza, the opinion pieces (“tribune”) they published seem to be all supporting Gaza. https://www.lemonde.fr/la-guerre-de-gaza/

They lost 900,000 people last year due to low natality.

Does he still install them himself? Isn’t it likely he sent someone to do it for him?

Good to hear!

On the less positive side: one of the judges disagreed with everything, tens of thousands of supporter were supporting him in the street when the ruling happened, parliament allies are trying to make an amnesty law for him. I hope Brazilian people keep fighting for their democracy hard because the attacks will never stop.

Isn’t it the case of every Supreme Court? Which one has a jury?

The STA report comes days after a plane carrying Ursula von der Leyen was hit by interference.

The pilots of the European Commission president’s plane reportedly had to land using paper maps, but did so safely.

And one year later half of it breaks because of a Gnome update. Maybe you should have followed up the specific repo that warned that you needed to move to this new extension, or maybe it just went silent without explanation. Something like that.

At some point the problem is that land needs to be reclaimed for nature. Artificialiazitation of natural land is the first cause of biodiversity loss before pollution and climate warming. You actually don’t need to actively plant, give the land back to nature and let it do its thing.

I don’t think these parts can happen without the main diplomacy part.

Who would be able to take it away from them? They’ll do everything possible to keep them. Move it, buy politicians, etc.

A sufficient amount of people, it has happened a couple of time in history.

You mean trickle down and that bs?

Yes the belief in such thing. If we go back to early society, it could be agreeing to follow a leader because you believe you’ll get more resources from working for his group than by yourself.

People let those other people control resources, could it be because they shared the greed and thought they would benefit more from it by letting that happen?