• 0 Posts
  • 30 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 28th, 2023

help-circle

  • mholiv@lemmy.worldtoLinux@lemmy.mlFedora Atomic is the bomb
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The reason I wouldn’t give advice if you didn’t want it because unwanted unsolicited advice tends to be useless and annoying for most people. If you didn’t want the advice I wouldn’t waste my time.

    My advice is to focus on being able to organize your thoughts and write them out in a cohesive structured way.

    This helps you:

    1. Express yourself in a clear, understandable, and perhaps persuasive way.
    2. Organize your own personal wants, needs, and desires introspectively.

    Both of these are important life skills that are extremely beneficial. Using a LLM to organize and clarify positions is like using a crutch when you should be in physical therapy. On top of this using a LLM completely erases any personality in your writing and replaces it with corpo style speak.

    Practicing organizing and expressing your ideas (like physical therapy) can be hard and sometimes painful. But you get better.

    Using a LLM is like refusing to go to physical therapy and using crutches for the rest of your life by choice. Easier in the short term but bad for your own quality of life long term.

    Places like lemmy are great for writing practice. Rambling nonsense is pretty universally downloaded. Lemmy forces you to organize and classify what you are thinking and why.

    If you want to get started I would recommend the basic “5 Paragraph Essay” structure. In the case of a basic lemmy comment take those principles and make it a 5 sentence structure.

    I hope this helps.



  • Do you always have ideas in the middle of the night and want to post them only to have an RSI flare up and no laptop nearby and decide to use ChatGPT to write your posts?

    It’s not just this response. All of your posts read the same way.

    Like using AI as a writing assistant is fine and all. But the posts you copy paste over are mostly LLM structured arguments.








  • They’re not refusing. They’re actually doing the opposite. But they needed to get their house in order first.

    The 3.0 upgrade was the result of the getting their house in order and modernizing. Doing cosmetic changed before hand would have made no sense because those changes would have been thrown away when they would have to modernize things anyways.

    I think I have an analogy.

    Gimp was like an old American style wooden house that was flooded. After the water recedes you could try to make things look nicer by plastering and painting the walls etc. But as goes with flooded houses if you do this the mold will rot everything out.

    In order to save a flooded house you need to remove all the dry wall and use fans to dry out the internals. Once things are dry then you can plaster and repaint things.

    Gimp 3.0 was them ripping out dry wall and air drying the internals. Now that that is done it now makes sense to clean up the UI.

    If you clean up the UI before you dry the walls out it’s just a waste of time because those improvements would need to be ripped out with the dry walls always.

    It’s not perfect as far as an analogy goes but it’s close. Gimp should have never let the house flood in the first place. (Analogy breaks down here a bit). But since they did. They needed to fix the fundamental before it would be worth fixing the UI.

    This all being said they could at this point genuinely refuse to change things UI wise. I hope they choose to pull a Blender or Krita but they don’t have to.


  • I mean the whole point of doing the mega rewrite to gtk3 was specifically to enable such forward looking progress.

    What they did in the 3.0 release was, largely, a massive modernization of a dinosaur code base.

    Now that it’s done it makes sense to do a UI overhaul. Before 3.0 it made no sense to even try, now it does.






  • I don’t think it’s equivalent to sovereign citizens. OP is the author of their comment and therefore has the copyrights. As the author one can license their work as all rights reserved or other permissive licenses.

    OP chooses to license their work as Creative Commons.

    They’re not forcing you to accept the license, it’s your local government that enforces copyright.

    The reason why this might work on Lemmy but not on corporate Social media is that corporate social media often have terms of service that require you to give them ownership/rights/etc. Lemmy has no such ToC.


  • It’s government reporting data. If you find a better source I say go for it. But I used that data for salary negotiations in the past successfully.

    I’m not talking about take home. I’m talking about total annual compensation including things like RSU payouts etc.

    Even if we throw out the ones you doubt there are many 300k to 400k entries with the AI researcher title. If we add annualized RSU payouts we easily hit over €500k.

    At this point t though you are free to doubt me.