gon [he]

Cool!

IDK if it’s AI or not, but it does look it.

There’s just a certain smoothness to the art you usually don’t find in human art. The crop is weird, the keys don’t make sense…

It might be human, I don’t know for sure, but it looks very AI.

This is kind of funny tbh

104%?

Is this the fucking Onion?!

NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

It was that easy, actually lol

NotTheOnion

IDK man, over here I don’t think police interactions are as violent as they are in the US…

That is so dystopian, holy shit… I mean, if you see it as something people would want/need, then yeah, that sounds good. I don’t know if such a thing exists, though. This link shares some things, features, and apps that maybe do some of what you’re talking about.

Because capital hasn’t been affected just yet, is my guess.

Edit: Spoke with a Serbian friend and they say it’s because of the lithium mines.

Great write-up by Niccolò.

I actually agree with the commenter on that post, the lack of quoting and using images is pretty bad, especially for screen-readers (which I use), and not directly linking sources (though they are made clear regardless) is a bit of a pain.

I hate how relatable this is.

I’ve been seeing quite a few posts about this, pretty funny that it all happened so fast.

Oh awesome :D

oh cool, I’ll definitely check it out !

Wah, good for you!

I’m invested solely in an all-world ETF, so I’m getting hit pretty hard by the market crashes in the US. It doesn’t really bother me too much, considering my time horizon, but still.

Good luck with your money!

Nowhere did I claim that billionaires are good.

Of course, nor did I mean to imply you did so!

I do get your point, and, on the surface level, I agree. However, I think it’s an inferior analysis of the situation.

Take your tiger metaphor; naturally, the rabid and hungry one is the most dangerous. Nevertheless, as you pointed out, they are both existential problems. I simply can’t celebrate, be satisfied, or even be appeased by the knowledge that we’re harbouring a hungry tiger, no matter what hungry and rabid tiger we may avoid by doing so. That’s my point.

It does seem we’re on the same page about this, to be honest… It’s just that your initial reply seemed a little — how do I put it… — irrelevant? It’s the Maxim of Quantity. We both agree that billionaires are fundamentally problematic, then why did you go and specify which ones are worse?

1. “Here’s a bowl of cereal. By the way, I didn’t piss in it.”

Yeah… I get that, but why would you even bring that up? Why say that? It doesn’t imply that you’re someone that pisses in cereal, but it does give off that feeling.

2. “Billionaires are bad. By the way, that kind of billionaire is worse.”

Yeah… I get that, but why would you even bring that up? Why say that? It doesn’t imply that you’re someone that thinks billionaires are good, but it does give off that feeling.

Do you pick up what I’m putting down?!

So? No billionaires at all are better than both cases. Bezos is evil too, any investment going towards him is terrible to. It’s better than Elon, but all this is terrible. Also, Bezos is not trying to preserve the status quo, he’s only trying to protect himself and his pockets, that’s all.

Not sure about that, but I can’t really say I disagree, fundamentally.

Well, Amazon isn’t exactly great for the EU, but at least it’s not Elon, IG…