Alternate headline: Judge tries to save the poor from starvation and save Republicans from themselves.

We talking Ozempic or a really thick joint?

One thing I like about Mamdani is that he clearly has contempt for these people, but also the self-control to keep it in plausible deniability territory.

FDR was, as far as I know, the last president to use price controls.

With ending the filibuster on the table, I’m pleasantly surprised Schumer hasn’t thrown in the towel in order to protect it.

Republicans: So, anyway, I doubled down…

Seeing that list of stars, I didn’t even need to open the article to see if Paramount was just conflating anti-genocide with anti-semitic.

They are, in case it wasn’t immediately clear.

No. Stop. Don’t.

I think we were headed to our current state of affairs since Reagan, but the police state status was definitely accelerated by 9/11.

This might actually affect some republican politicians. They must REALLY want health insurance premiums to go up.

Osama bin Laden would be thrilled with the state of the US today.

We the jury find the defendant guilty of wasting a perfectly good sandwich, when samples of dog poop were readily available for throwing at fascists.

A non-sociopath might express sympathy for the victims.

True, but that’s separate from age, and he’s corrupt too.

Poison gas > growl, obviously.

Pelosi is unquestionably sharper than Schumer.

At this point I’m starting to wonder if they have something on him. Of course, it could just be garden-variety corruption.

Yep. Make better choices at the ballot box. Unimpressed with your options in the ballot box? Make better choices in the primaries.

Sure, there’s always been corruption, and sure, Trump is more brazen about it. But you’re leaving out context when you fail to mention that the scale and regularity of the corruption is an order of magnitude bigger with Trump in office. People trying to normalize him can eat shit.

Remember this when they say the only paedophile in the Epstein files was Epstein.