Sharing it with everyone is, though. It helps! Chances are a European will hear about it.

Ew, spyware. This def violates GDPR

Freeing the tiddy through tariffs /j

That sucks to hear, though; if you have friends overseas or nearby, couldn’t hurt to ask them?

You’re right, biological warfare would be a better term.

Never attribute to incompetence that which can also be attributed to malice.

Calling him a “vaccine critic” is rich; he’s a child killer. Due to him, directly, thousands of children will die preventable deaths.

I think a better title would also be “The Playbook Used To Kill People, By Spreading Lies About Vaccines”. Or simply, “The Playbook Used For Biological Warfare”.

Willfully not vaccinating a ton of people, in my view, is indirect biological warfare.

Well, Kropotkin agrees with you in the last regard; that power should not be concentrated at all.

What he favours is a system such as yours, but differently. Trusts, which are inherently money-based, would be meaningless under an anarchocommunist system, as there is no money to speak of. A gift economy is one option, in where goods are directly given to one another without expectation of reward, and without a middle man such as money.

To prevent a “free rider” or “hoarder” problem, a pay-it-forward model could be handy, in where if you want goods, you need to give plenty back to the community.

Hmm, I don’t know your situation, but if you’re living in Switzerland, Norway, the Faroe Islands, or Iceland, I honestly would just recommend staying there.

If it’s in Serbia, Montenegro, Kosovo, or Bosnia, then yeah, fair. But I thought none of those had good privacy laws?

Can’t imagine Belarus, Ukraine, Russia, or Turkey have good privacy laws. And certainly not any of the North African countries…

If Thiel’s mafia organisation (I refuse to call that scrap by desecrating sir Tolkien’s works’ names) has a deal with the NHS, then that should be ended ASAP. Fuck that, that’s some serious spying.

Capitalism is shit, and there are things where it especially NEVER, EVER should have any access, power or influence, directly or indirectly:

• Health services
• Parliaments, committees, assemblies
• Nature
• Housing
• Water and food
• National security

I wouldn’t take it up, honestly. Best to go for somewhere in the EU instead.

The UK is a US puppet state, and pretty much showing it.

It’s indeed ridiculous. At some point I had no internet access, no playboy, no drawing stuff. So, anyway, I just used my good ol’ imagination.

They always seek to control that which is natural: the urge to have a happy life, with pleasure.

They could better spend their time combatting the corruption within the Tories and Labour, and actually putting up a proportional representation system. Or yet better, workplace democracy for all. People can follow a leader if they want, but it’s nice if everyone else also can live as they want.

If they cared about kids, I think it’s better to educate them about how to navigate the internet safely. Prohibiting the internet for kids is one thing, but imo it’s a bandaid fix for bad parenting.

Better to tell them “never give away your real name, address, or age”, and “never ask for the same of someone else”. And that when they see something awful, it’s best to talk with their parents about it. Kids need to grow up safely, yes, but they should also be independent, not boxed in by helicopter parents.

When I was younger, I was often on the internet and mostly just visited the safe sites. Occassionally I saw the one off scary site but I knew to avoid it later then, or talked about it irl with friends and family.

Kropotkin was right all along.

What we need, is not a wage slavery system centered around what we earn; but a society based around what we need.

We need to establish our own farms, our own woodcutters, our own medical aids; and we give to each other freely, so that we may freely receive in return.

So they prefer to spy on what their kids are doing? Bah, those ministers are nonce creeps.

Based union leaders. Screw oligarchs!