I mean, they haven’t said that yet. While the current supreme court have made some genuinely insane rulings, they’ve generally at least made the pretence of trying to square everything they’re doing with the constitution, albeit often in very strained or roundabout ways. I’m not sure if they’ll be able to find a way to justify this (but I’m not ruling it out either).

Yeah, but they’re explicitly saying it’s only to protect Christianity, so that throws that defense right out the window.

So, this is blatantly and egregiously unconstitutional, right?

his mistake

Reported!

It’s not a front. They don’t do smokescreens, they don’t do distractions, they don’t do sleight if hand. Every awful thing they do is because they want to do that awful thing. But what they have learned is that if you do enough awful things all at once, it makes it much more likely that you’ll get away with at least some of them.