• 0 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • You’re talking about a great number of organisations, with different decision makers. It takes time and political will to coordinate and execute this kind of big switch. This needs to happen to become independant from foreign monopolies, but I’m not surprised it hasn’t already happened.

    The EU commission decides for some EU institutions. Member countries decide for their own institutions and military. Each country and military has its own labyrinth of bureaucracy with lengthy decision making, and large+complex IT infrastructures. All of this has inertia. And switching cost money, even if it’s possible to save on license cost on the long run.





  • Hirom@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.mlLet's update...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Which Debian distribution are you using, stable, testing, unstable?

    I take care of a couple machines for family members. Those have Debian stable with automatic update (unattended-upgrade). I can’t recall the system or packages ever breaking. At most users are a bit confused when an update change the UI a bit.

    Sticking to stable and avoiding third party repos gives a pretty solid system. Only developers or sysadmins might consider Debian testing. Only people working on Debian itself should use unstable.




  • Depending on the context, this may or may not be a false dichotomy.

    If considering the act of voting in an election in a country with a two party system, each with a different shade of neoliberalism, then there are two choices realistically, and picking the lesser evil is a decent moral choice.

    If considering other countries or primaries where there are more than two options polling above 2%, then it’d be a false dichotomy.











  • Hirom@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.mlAh yes the "enlightened" democracies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Thanks for the context.

    Given Russia submitted the text, and given how european countries voted, I suspect this is mostly about Russia looking for justifications for attacking a neighbour and grabbing land.

    Defending Nazism or showing Nazi symbols is illegal in Germany. Holocaust denial is illegal in several european countries. Yet they abstained.

    They’d probably vote for such a text if it came from another country that doesn’t “undermine genuine attempts to combat neo-Nazism”