We trying to get nuclear war?

Everyone has agency to be more decerning with their purchases.

What about where to draw the line? Everyday the money we use is funneled to some corporation that has a hand in the human suffering that happens around the globe. When is thier evil transfered to me because I contributed to their successs.

I have a hard time reconciling killing is justifiable. I can agree if your life is in immediate danger but then you have the cops who use it as a license to kill. I lean on the side that some things just can’t be justified and we have to mitigate/manage these instances.

Good luck to you in your cause. I hope you continue to articulate what it is you believe in a kind way, it will go a lot further, I believe.

Oh, well when you take away the snark its actually a powerful message. Thanks!

Sorry. Not sure what you mean by this, can you break it down for me?

Bernie, a notorious independent.

Do something that would warrent the GOP being hostile tward you, maybe.

I swear, you have to be so entrenched in media to understand a headline like this.

I would drop off the face of the earth only to stash porn mags all over the woods.

Chuck Schumer is running the bet that the GOP will implode before the whole country goes up in flames.

It’s solely a hedge to save his party and capture as much power as possible.

Maybe it works but it was never for you. Unless you believe the democrats are actually “elites” that deserve to be in charge.

Personally, I think their time has come and gone and it’s a crying shame they were never once put together well enough to do something for those that come after.

Clownworld brought to by ass blasting supreme^tm ceral and fast food, it’s meatacular!

Consumes Simpsons enough to adopt it as an ideology.

“I’m wicked smhart.”

What studies? Just fucking link them.

Go on, now. Cya.

I didn’t back him. I didn’t sign up. Can I be excused please?

From the first link:

One epidemiologic study looked at a population exposed to chloramine in its drinking water and used the disease risk as a baseline for comparing the risk in a population exposed to chlorine in its drinking water. These findings will be addressed only briefly as they are not directly relevant to this document.

Have you looked through the second link? It’s all about EPA methods. If I felt further discussion with you might be productive I might investigate some of the citations. I just think you’re accusing me of one thing and I’m saying something entirely different.

Don’t forget some studies on the benefits

Are you suggesting chlorine is actually good for you, not that it has antibacterial properties that makes the water safer for consumption?

I’ll skip the chlorine safety stuff because I asked for a study.

As far as the toxicity stuff I’m not concerned because you’re still talking about concentration (see. Dilution).

If you had any tact you would understand that I’m not trying to say chlorine is unsafe for human consumption I’m saying that the goal of science isn’t to determine every possible outcome of consuming it.

Anyway. You’ll just have disregard me because we aren’t communicating on the same level.

Again, you’re talking about a dilution. Is a glass of water with trace amount of chlorine, chlorine?

I’d gladly review any study, that you’re aware of, that states there are no longer term effects of drinking trace amounts of chlorine. That is, since it’s such a walk in the park to do.

The dnc is a sunk cost.

You want a country where you can live free, you’re going to have to take it yourself.

Dont worry though, that will be some other generations problem. Most of us will just have to live through the enshitification of everything. Cherish these last days. You may never see any like them again. You might even wake up one day and think, the status quo was like being stuck at the top of a Farris wheel. Scary, and uncertain but the view was amazing.

There is nothing inaccurate about stating poison is poison. You’re arguing the poison will not have an effect. That does not mean anything about its chemical structure or toxic properties have changed.

There is a reason the LD50 is listed. It shows a what concentration will kill a species of animal, usually mice. This is not entire analogous to humans but we accept this is the only practice that is maybe acceptable.

We do not test on humans and there is no blind study to show there are no longterm effects of consuming trace amounts of chlorine in water.