• 0 Posts
  • 49 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: March 6th, 2025

help-circle






  • It’s only natural that lords would want more money. Blinding peasants is moral, legal and gets lords more money, which is totally fine capitalism if you ask me. Very good for the economy and creates jobs. It’s on the peasants to research and find out which lord is trustworthy and which isn’t. Due diligence and all, you know? This is something you would do when courting a partner as well!

    Personally, I got tested and have an IQ of 155 thanks to my lord father educating me about his legal crimes growing up, so I wouldn’t fall for bad merchandise even if the other lords tried to trick me into trying their products.

    Anyways, good luck to the peasantry, which I am totally a part of (ignore the fact that my father was a lord, just think about my big number IQ and how smart I sound). Wise up!




  • I really don’t think so. Many of the countries you think of as more democratic have a Monarch as head of State, because it’s understood between the Monarch and the people that if the Monarch steps out of line, the people will recognize it as obvious and kill them.

    A dictator isn’t as obvious and as we see in the US, they change shit under your nose and their end goal isn’t as obvious as a Monarch’s, so many in the population don’t recognize their intentions as being a power grab (sound familiar?). A Monarch undermining democracy is obviously wanting power back, a dictator? Well they could just be “Doing it for the good of the people 🤪”. Most people aren’t stupid enough to fall for a Monarch saying they are grabbing power “For the good of the people”, but are stupid enough to fall for a politician saying this, since they believe a politician is “One of them” (as they ignorantly believe all politicians come from their class; the peasantry). A Monarch was, is and never will be “One of us”, they were obviously never peasants, so less people fall for the BS.