I was kinda annoyed at the article for not giving any details on the kinds of policies they wanted there, even something as simple as better tax credits for having kids would go a long way towards making children affordable. And yet I am sure that’s not what these people are advocating for.
That stance against sports betting annoys me so much, because that means I can’t just look at everything they stand for and say I want the opposite.
I don’t think that scotus ruling does bar congress from investigating stuff actually, the supreme court doesn’t have jurisdiction over impeachments. That’s not to say they will, just that I’m pretty sure they can.
Holy shit, the first thing I see when I visit that website is a popup telling me to either pay them, or accept that they are going to track me and sell the data to over 400 third parties. Fuck that.
Oh hey, it’s this asshole. This guy is the reason I reacted to that news about making all court rulings only apply locally with some humorous positivity. (also because humor helps me cope with general awfulness)
Honestly I think it would be funny to see them try. The vtuber market is pretty resistant to allowing the kind of abusive monetization practices that techbros like, at least from my observations with Niji and the like.
I mean, this is late even by that metric.
What, so I get to stop caring what Matthew Kacsmaryk, that one judge in the fifth circuit who is the only judge in his division so he is easy to shop for, has to say. I’ll be honest, this sounds like a win to me, though I do admit it is going to make protecting the country from Trump more expensive.
My stance on fixing the debt has long been that the only answer is to invest in robust social programs. Such social programs pretty much always increase economic activity, which the government gets to collect taxes on every step of the way. Of course that only works if such investment exists and the government is willing to collect those taxes, neither of which seem to be the case anymore.
That’s really not a very specific list. Being comprehensive and listing all religions that exist would be unreasonably and unnecessarily verbose.
You forgot the whining about DEI.
That didn’t happen.
And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.
And if it was, that’s not a big deal.
And if it is, that’s not my fault. <- You are here
And if it was, I didn’t mean it.
And if I did, you deserved it.
See, I’d have said George Santos is the poster child for that.
The main difference between this and that appear to be that in this case the copyright holders are seeking to identify users, while in that case they had already identified people and were mad they were justifiably ignored when they provided insufficient information when requesting a block.
I will point out that this cannot change the result of the presidential election, since Trump didn’t win the state in question anyway.