• hotspur@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Many positions in federal service are banned from joining unions—most of the higher scale / subject matter expert and “white color” roles.

    These were doctors and epidemiologists, and were also in a special 2 year program, so they wouldn’t have had the standard protections of competitive service, and might also have been excluded from union membership.

    Worth noting that aside from some lawsuit exposure, fed unions are not allowed, by law, to strike. (Reagan terminated thousands of air traffic controllers when they struck and replaced them with scab labor as an example) And the current admin doesn’t seem to scared of laws or lawsuits at the moment. (Hopefully they’re wrong in that confidence, but who knows)

    I would join a union in a heartbeat, but my position is barred from it.

      • hotspur@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yep, for sure. The tradeoff was supposed to be the higher protections that come with competitive service positions, but those protections are being ignored or illegally removed week by week, so yeah at this point anyone should be allowed to join the union.

        But to be honest? Its looking more and more like the admin is going to break binding union agreements as well so maybe it’s all just fucked.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Worth noting that aside from some lawsuit exposure, fed unions are not allowed, by law, to strike. (Reagan terminated thousands of air traffic controllers when they struck and replaced them with scab labor as an example)

      The shit we’re going through to today is what happens when striking workers don’t break the scabs’ kneecaps, “legal” or not.