• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The Gates Foundation backpedaled that stance shortly after. Their initial objection was over quality assurance.

    • Chastity2323@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The Gates Foundation backpedaled that stance shortly after

      can you provide a source for this?

      Their initial objection was over quality assurance

      Who is he to decide this? He is not an epidemiologist or a public health expert or a leader of a low-resource nation or even a health professional. He’s a tech billionaire. This is exactly the problem.

      Many large US companies, including pharmaceutical drug retailers, directly invest in the Gates Foundation Trust, creating a massive conflict of interest which is rarely talked about.

      https://healthscienceandlaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Public-Interest-Position.WHO_.FENSAGates.Jan2017.pdf

      https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/science/16malaria.html

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The Gates Foundation backpedaled that stance shortly after

        can you provide a source for this?

        Literally the first search result LINK

        Who is he to decide this?

        He was cohosting the multinational committee event for Gavi, a vaccine alliance which includes the WHO ans UNICEFF. He is widely respected there because he runs an organization which spent decades of providing medicines and vaccines across the globe.

        • Chastity2323@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Literally the first search result LINK

          This appears to be just a statement of support for “narrow” patent waviers during the pandemic. This is not the same as open licensing the Oxford vaccine and calling this “backpedaling” is misleading at best.