The ruling, which is limited to the Southern District of Texas, prohibited the administration from using the wartime law because the president’s claims about a Venezuelan gang do not add up to an “invasion.”
Exactly. The most I’ve heard are a few isolated incidents of intimidation, attempted arson, and some voter roll purges (but they were allowed to use a provisional ballot).
There’s several articles covering each, but this one from USA Today covers them at least in an overview.
None of that is anywhere near the magnitude OC is claiming, and is no more or less than any other election year with the exception of the 30,000 to 40,000 damaged voter registration forms in Arizona (see USA Today link above). And of those, it wouldn’t have made a difference even if all of those voted for Harris.
Again, as much as I wish there was fraud or something on a scale large enough to change the outcome, there’s no credible evidence pointing to that.
Exactly. The most I’ve heard are a few isolated incidents of intimidation, attempted arson, and some voter roll purges (but they were allowed to use a provisional ballot).
There’s several articles covering each, but this one from USA Today covers them at least in an overview.
None of that is anywhere near the magnitude OC is claiming, and is no more or less than any other election year with the exception of the 30,000 to 40,000 damaged voter registration forms in Arizona (see USA Today link above). And of those, it wouldn’t have made a difference even if all of those voted for Harris.
Again, as much as I wish there was fraud or something on a scale large enough to change the outcome, there’s no credible evidence pointing to that.