This should be the sticking point to invoke the 25th. Officials need to be loud and make a stink about how Trump can’t tell fact from clear fiction and therefore cannot perform the duties of the office. Make the people of America see the image on the news everyday and make those on his side say out loud if they think it’s fake or real. Half of the masses will never be convinced that he lacks the morality to lead until they’re already in his camps. This is the earliest clear as day moment to act on that which cannot be held to subjective scrutiny or partisanship.

  • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    “I’m just a history buff, even though I have literally shown zero indication that I give a shit about history in any other context”

    He has the preamble to the declaration of independence on his other arm lmao. I agree the guy’s most likely a neo Nazi but boy are your arguments dumb.

    • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Lol oh yes, just like diehard 2A advocates. Anyone who references 3 words of the constitution or declaration is clearly a history buff.

      Can’t be a nationalist with a 3rd-grade understanding of history. As we all know, only historians get a tattoo of “We the People” on their arm.

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I didn’t say it made him a history buff. I said your argument was dumb. You show up with that argument against anyone who doesn’t already agree with you and you’re going to get reamed.

        I’m not defending him. I’m criticizing you.

        • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Oh lol. Thanks, I guess. I don’t see it as a very good counter argument though. I don’t understand why you think the idea would be more powerful from someone who disagrees… because I still don’t see how “We The People” indicates he has any interest in history.

          I don’t think anyone who disagrees - who thinks shallow nationalism equates to historical investment - is ready for a productive conversation anyway.

          So I guess I’m criticizing you too.