• danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe. I was confused by their last comment that in no way acknowledged the point I made. This specific article is good journalism. But the commenter didn’t not acknowledge that.

    • thanks AV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The first bit where they said “accounting for it all is real journalism” was in reference to the posted article.

      The original original comment didn’t say anything about the posted article but was lambasting the fact that most of the other publications don’t actually investigate the claims being made and instead just broadcast the claims as if they are legitimate on their face. Once the article we’re commenting under was brought up they agreed that the journalism there was good.

      I had to go all the way to the top comment in the chain to figure out which reply you were talking about but yeah they agreed with you on the merits of this story and gave props