Never understood the desire to send live reporters into hostile territory. What does reporting live accomplish other than random deaths? Send a robot if you need footage.
Three different reasons. One, gathering facts and being able to present them to the world as they happen so the people that aren’t there can understand. The second is to show the horrors or war so the people that aren’t there can understand. The third is to twist the narrative so that the people that aren’t there can feel whatever way the propagandist chooses.
Consider how our opinions would have been shaped if there was no reporting from inside Gaza and all the info we got was from IDF or IDF-approved reporting from Israel. The purpose of sending live reporters in hostile territory is to avoid that outcome.
How else are they supposed to know what is happening there? Just read it on the internet? Think about that for a second.
Journalism. It’s not just about footage, it’s about finding out what’s going on.
Holy fuck
I just shit that guys pants
Bro you shat my pants too
I had two shits on the bounce. Now I know why.
subtract 5 feet from the next one boys!
He’d be dead if the missile hadn’t hit exactly in the previous hole made by another missile on that bridge he was standing on
Ohh… it’s a bridge! I was wondering what they had against that one particular patch of road.
These camera man and the reporter lived, but I wouldn’t be surprised to hear about life long injuries. Shrapnel, concussive forces. Not something I’d want to be around.
OpenAI Targetting™
Missile was only rendered with 1 wing
The classic war crime double tap, to kill more innocent rescue workers, reporters, etc.
The good ol’ Bibi tradition of shooting reporters?
And straight into already bombed hole. Bastards were probably presuming the reporter was helping someone and tried to “double tap.”
