We’ve been searching for a memory-safe programming language to replace C++ in Ladybird for a while now. We previously explored Swift, but the C++ interop never quite got there, and platform support outside the Apple ecosystem was limited. Rust is a different story. The ecosystem is far more mature for systems programming, and many of our contributors already know the language. Going forward, we are rewriting parts of Ladybird in Rust.

Porting LibJS

I used Claude Code and Codex for the translation. This was human-directed, not autonomous code generation. I decided what to port, in what order, and what the Rust code should look like. It was hundreds of small prompts, steering the agents where things needed to go. After the initial translation, I ran multiple passes of adversarial review, asking different models to analyze the code for mistakes and bad patterns.

  • SwooshBakery624 [they/them]@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I will copy my comment here:

    Just so you know, Drew DeVault is a pedophile apologist. He cannot even remotely be considered a reliable source of information.

    However, I completely agree regarding the use of AI, especially in a project such as a browser engine.

    EDIT: I accidentally replied to this comment instead of the one with the link to Drew DeVault’s blog. My bad.

    • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Most of the information that you get about terrible people comes from terrible people because that is who knows them. Should we discount Trump accusations from Epstein because they came from a known pedo? No, pedos are the people that Trump hangs out with because that is what he is.

      • TomAwezome@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Given that Drew Devault has pity for pedophiles, the correct choice is to discount anything he says, much like you should discount anything Trump or Epstein claims without further primary sources of evidence from unaffiliated parties

        • Spectrism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          This is not at all comparable to Trump/Epstein. Drew was only pitying pedophiles, not actual rapists This may come as a surprise to you, but there is a very clear difference (one is a choice, the other is not).

          • TomAwezome@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Nobody should pity pedophiles, you should want them removed from society permanently. If that’s controversial, so be it

              • TomAwezome@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                You’d agree of course, that pedophiles should be removed from society? Is the idea of shaming pedophiles and pedo apologists some kind of line in the sand that shouldn’t be crossed in your eyes?

                • Spectrism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  You’d agree of course, that pedophiles should be removed from society?

                  No, I would most definitely not. In the same way that I would not agree that we should remove all men from society just because they make up the majority of rapists.

                  Is the idea of shaming pedophiles and pedo apologists some kind of line in the sand that shouldn’t be crossed in your eyes?

                  Yes.