Summary

Donald Trump is pressuring Jordan and Egypt to accept his plan to relocate nearly 2 million Palestinians from Gaza, threatening to cut U.S. aid if they refuse.

His proposal, which aims to transform Gaza into “the Riviera of the Middle East,” has sparked backlash from Middle Eastern leaders, including Jordan’s King Abdullah II.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio is engaging regional leaders but has avoided confirming whether Palestinians could return.

Analysts argue Trump’s approach risks further destabilizing the region and undermining U.S. influence in Middle East diplomacy.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Dubai already exists and it is also built on human suffering and death. Tourists flock there.

    You are sadly correct, it will be another rich persons playground. Trump just wants his own Dubai.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I am super desperate for a job right now to the point that I have done things like hold my nose and apply for jobs at Crypto and AI companies and even Phillip-Morris because I know it won’t be forever.

      But there is a company that keeps advertising for a remote job for a company based in Dubai that I am qualified for and applying for that is just going too far. Even too far when I’m willing to apply for a job at Phillip-Morris. Maybe eventually I’ll have to do it, but I really hope not.

      • benignintervention@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I got a Mozilla plug-in just to block Data Annotation Tech because they have a thousand jobs listed under different names for what is essentially the same AI training job. Super sketchy and they only pay through PayPal

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        I know the feeling… I’m going through the same right now.

        The worst part about it all is that we can “vote with our wallet” all we want, it doesn’t change much if we all have to work for the same companies we’re trying to boycott. Our labor does way more for them than our individual purchases.

        I’ve said for years people need to vote with their paycheck, but we’re getting fucking crushed and there’s few choices left.

        I remember literally getting into an argument with an corporate AT&T employee on reddit after the reveal of Room 641A. I argued that their labor was directly allowing this kind of shenanigans to happen, and if they really had a problem with it like they said, they needed to find a different job.

        Back then things were still good enough that sort of thing might have made a difference. We’re all under The Boot now.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Also “voting with your wallet” only works if you have enough money to make the choice regardless of whether or not those choices exist. I’d love to buy Canadian made products crafted by small businesses for everything I do but sometimes I just can’t afford it. Sometimes I’ll just not buy the thing, of course, but other times it can’t be avoided.

          Conservatives will shit all over someone for complaining and then not “putting their money where their mouth is” but if you buy anything other than the cheapest shit you’re “irresponsible and shouldn’t complain about low wages if you’re gunna buy a brandname bag of chips”. It’s so exhausting.

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            Absolutely. Lots of people are in poverty and literally cannot afford to vote with their wallet anymore.

            Further, the whole “no ethical consumption under capitalism” thing. Once in a while someone just needs something comforting and their individual act of purchase alone isn’t enough to say they’re the problem. Especially if they’re not spending money on such things at such places very often.

            At some level we still need to allow people some small comforts, even if those small comforts come at a social cost. The social cost of being in complete discomfort and not being able to relax is pretty high in comparison to the social cost of a single purchase.