I’m planning to install Arch Linux for the first time. Any recommendations on setup, must-have applications, or best practices? Also, what’s something you wish you knew before switching to Arch?

  • azron@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Rust based is not a feature it is a slogan. Yay is the defacto standard and also actively developed. That being said use whatever works for you and AUR.

    • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Pacman is the only standard package manager for Arch. Arch recommends against using third party package managers, including Yay.

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ya. Ok. But pacman does not let you use the AUR. Using the AUR is one did the primary reasons to choose Arch.

        So, if you want to use the AUR, you need to use something like yay or paru. And, if you do, you no longer need to use pacman.

        To be clear to the newbies, pacman -Syu updates your entire system ( except packages from the AUR ). yay -Syu updates your entire system, including packages from the AUR.

        If you just ran yay -Syu, running pacman -Syu will report that there is “nothing to do” since your system will already be up to date.

        The same is true if you sub paru for yay above.

        • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          You definitely do not need to use any pacman wrappers to build a package from the AUR. Those tools make it easy, yes, but are not required.

          Building a package can be as simple as

          • git clone AURpackagehere
          • cd AURpackagehere
          • makepkg -si
          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Um. Ya, I guess. Ok.

            First, how do you keep that package up to date?

            Real question though is, do you really think that is better than “yay -S AURpackagehere” or even “paru AURpackagehere”?

            • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              To update the package, you use git to pull the latest branch code and repeat the process. You should double check if there are dependency changes though.

              Like I said, its easier with a pacman wrapper, but not necessary.

              • LeFantome@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Yes. Thank you. My question (or point) was how you know that the package needs to be updated? As you point out, I need to do that for dependencies as well.

                You are certainly correct though. You can pull AUR packages and build them without yay or paru.

                • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 hours ago

                  Per the Arch Wiki:

                  The AUR is unsupported, so any packages you install are your responsibility to update, not pacman’s. If packages in the official repositories are updated, you will need to rebuild any AUR packages that depend on those libraries.

                  Arch Wiki - Arch User Repository

      • Corroded@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Is there a chance that Arch says that so they don’t have to take on the responsibility of endorsing yay while also acknowledging its prevalence?

        Like if Nintendo made a statement saying they recommend against third party mods or repairs that deal with joycon stick drift because they don’t want to be held accountable or contacted about issues consumers run into a result of them.

        • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          My understanding is this:

          It’s just the principle of AUR wrappers. Yes they are very useful, but anyone and their uncle can put a package in AUR name it whatever they want as long as it’s not taken. AUR wrapper makes it easier to install things without knowing much, but manually searching for something, finding it, and installing it involves conscious choices. Arch cannot be responsible for people installing malware from a software they recommended, that’s why it’s kept this way intensionally.

          Imagine if yay/paru came with the os, or could be installed from pacman, then people would just recommend doing that to new users and then they might just install whatever and break the system a lot more.