Summary

Proton Mail, known for its privacy-first email services, faced backlash after CEO Andy Yen praised the Republican Party and its antitrust stance.

The company initially posted and deleted a statement supporting Yen’s comments, later claiming an “internal miscommunication” and reiterating its political neutrality.

Critics question Proton’s impartiality, particularly as it cooperates with Swiss authorities on legal data requests.

Privacy advocates warn that political alignments could undermine trust, especially for Proton’s users—journalists and activists wary of government surveillance under administrations like Trump’s.

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      While the comments were not welcome and left a sour taste, we are blowing it a bit out of proportion here.

        • warm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Person A has an opinion, that is allowed. Person B has opinion, that is not allowed.

  • sith@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I really don’t understand why smart people put their eggs in the proton basket.

    Big (shady) money rule Switzerland. A Swiss server or company isn’t safer or more trustworthy. Quite the opposite.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Excluding Switzerland from the equation, most in the US don’t have + or - for Switzerland unless it’s banking.

      You can never trust any company to put your needs first. A good moral company has at least its founders, private funders, employees, and vendors to look after before they worry about your wants and needs.

      Proton was kinda small. 500 employees for a communications company isn’t bad.

      Good start.

      Proton made a name for itself. WE ARE PRIVACY FIRST and they mostly delivered on that in technical capabilities.

      So far, so good.

      Then they doxed someone’s IP (french?) due to a remote government order.

      Not great, but anyone would do that. There have to be limits. That said, they now clearly play ball with governments.

      All the other providers would do the same. They’re now on par with most, but less likely to sell all my data down the river. But my needs are to keep my secrets state secret level. (or so I think)

      Then he crawls up Trumps ass.

      Now, I’m doing nothing illegal. Nothing immoral. Nothing questionable by the previous administrations standards, but what happens If I start to protest? If I subscribe to democratic news sources, is this jackass going to train an AI on my and hand my name address and phone number to the neo facists running my country now?

      We put our eggs wherever we think they can best be served conveniently and for the best price.

      You can also choose to not put your eggs anywhere. You can secure your email but not sending any.

      we were trying to choose price+convenience+security.

      knock one of those legs out, it’s not a table anymore.

  • TsarVul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I migrated literally everything from Gmail around 2021. Gotta tell ya, I feel just about dumb as shit right now. I kind of understand people with those “I bought this before he sieg heiled” bumper stickers on their Teslas.

      • the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Tbh I think proton is solid. What the CEO said is just stating a fact of the situation 10 years ago and linking it to now. I don’t believe that’s right but he posted the message 4th of December which (if I’m not mistaken) was before it was clear all the tech CEOs were sucking his dick like we saw around his in inauguration.

        I’d still recommend it, the other stuff the CEO says on twitter is all very logical and positive for privacy and against big tech. Unfortunately someone says something that is remotely questionable (not like this guy has outright praised Trump far as I can tell) and sudetly Proton is a dead service not considering all the good they have done and will (probably) continue to do

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Wow. There’s a whole lot of people here reacting to the headline, and not actually reading the story. That’s important, because the journalist’s headline is (shocker) a huge overstatement.

    I was concerned as I’m a Proton user and have been for years, and hard left politically, and despise Trump. But maybe lets just read it before reacting?

    Here’s what the CEO posted on Xitter:

    10 years ago, Republicans were the party of big business and Dems stood for the little guys, but today the tables have completely turned.

    Yep. That’s a bad look. Doesn’t make a lot of sense either because the Republicans are very much the party of big business and corporate handouts and deregulation in oil, gas, energy, mining, manufacture, industrial farming etc.

    Then here’s what Proton’s team said on Reddit as an explanation and expansion of the CEO’s post (and then later deleted):

    Here is our official response, also available on the Mastodon post in the screenshot:

    Corporate capture of Dems is real. In 2022, we campaigned extensively in the US for anti-trust legislation.

    Two bills were ready, with bipartisan support. Chuck Schumer (who coincidentally has two daughters working as big tech lobbyists) refused to bring the bills for a vote.

    At a 2024 event covering antitrust remedies, out of all the invited senators, just a single one showed up - JD Vance.

    By working on the front lines of many policy issues, we have seen the shift between Dems and Republicans over the past decade first hand.

    Dems had a choice between the progressive wing (Bernie Sanders, etc), versus corporate Dems, but in the end money won and constituents lost.

    Until corporate Dems are thrown out, the reality is that Republicans remain more likely to tackle Big Tech abuses.

    First off, I feel like I’ve read from hundreds of Lemmy users total agreement that the Democratic party is captured by corporate interests, so I really doubt any disagreement with that section of Proton’s post. My reaction to the remainder is that it’s not at all praise for the Republican party, just the factual statement of the sad reality that Republicans with their very hard-on-Silicon-Valley rhetoric are more likely to actually reign in the big tech companies than the Democratic party - and Proton is in a good position to have seen this first hand. Zero of the statement praises Trump or praises Republicans, and there is in fact lament that the Democrats didn’t stick harder with their left-wing candidates, even highlighting Bernie. I can see why they deleted it though, it’s office chatter than never should have left the cubicle.

    TL;DR: storm in a teacup, I’ll be keeping my Proton mail account.

    p.s. yes this is my first Lemmy post. I’m a longtime lurker though. I felt strongly enough about this to make an account to post, as nobody seemed to be actually posting the content of the article - just reacting. Edit: typos & formatting of the quote.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Due respect, your take is obtuse at best or you’re a shill. The company, with current leadership in place, just cannot come back from the first statement, it illustrates a fundamental detachment from objective reality, to the point that you’ve lost any and all credibility, permanently.

      In a business based on trust, this is just so clear. Poop